Is xTAx always non-zero for a real, symmetric, nonsingular matrix A?

Click For Summary
For a real, symmetric, nonsingular matrix A, the expression xTAx is indeed non-zero for any non-zero vector x. This is because such matrices are diagonalizable, and in their diagonal form, the eigenvalues are all positive due to the nonsingularity of A. Consequently, the quadratic form xTAx will yield a positive value for any non-zero x. The discussion emphasizes the importance of diagonalization in understanding the properties of the matrix. Therefore, xTAx is always non-zero for x≠0.
elimax
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Basic question, I think, but I'm not sure. It is a step in a demonstration, so it would be nice if it were true.
smile.gif


True or false? Why? If A is a real, symmetric, nonsingular matrix, then xTAx≠0 for x≠0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since ##A## is real and symmetric, it is diagonalizable. So you may start by thinking about ##x^T A x## in a basis in which ##A## is diagonal.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K