Quadratic inequalities for complex variables?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the properties of quadratic inequalities involving complex variables, specifically regarding a quadratic function where λ is asserted to be real. It is noted that if the inequality holds for all real λ, then the quadratic has no real roots, implying that the roots must be complex or purely imaginary. The participants clarify that a quadratic with real coefficients will have no real roots if its discriminant is negative. This condition ensures that the solutions include an imaginary component. Understanding these properties is crucial for analyzing quadratic inequalities in the context of complex variables.
mathsciguy
Messages
134
Reaction score
1
Hello, I was looking at Riley's solution manual for this specific problem. Along the way, he ended up with a quadratic inequality:

View attachment how.bmp

If you looked at the image, he said it is given that λ is real, but he asserted that λ has no real roots because of the inequality. Doesn't that mean λ is imaginary or complex in some points then, contradicting his first statement? I reckon this has something to do with the properties of a quadratic inequality for complex variables.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathsciguy said:
Hello, I was looking at Riley's solution manual for this specific problem. Along the way, he ended up with a quadratic inequality:

View attachment 61729

If you looked at the image, he said it is given that λ is real, but he asserted that λ has no real roots because of the inequality. Doesn't that mean λ is imaginary or complex in some points then, contradicting his first statement? I reckon this has something to do with the properties of a quadratic inequality for complex variables.

\lambda doesn't have roots; it's an arbitrary real number. The quadratic P: z \mapsto az^2 + bz + c has roots, which are those z \in \mathbb{C} for which P(z) = 0. The point is that if P(\lambda) > 0 for all real \lambda then P has no real roots, because if z is real then P(z) \neq 0 and z cannot be a root of P.
 
That's cool, I get it now. Then that means the roots are either purely imaginary or complex (but not purely real) right? Then why is it required that the discriminant be less than zero? Is it because it will make sure that part of the solution will have an imaginary part?
 
Last edited:
mathsciguy said:
That's cool, I get it now. Then that means the roots are either purely imaginary or complex (but not purely real) right? Then why is it required that the discriminant be less than zero? Is it because it will make sure that part of the solution will have an imaginary part?

Yes. A quadratic with real coefficients has no real roots if and only if the discriminant is negative.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K