Integration being unchanged after rotation

In summary, the question is about the general loop correction to the propagator in QFT and the possibility of rotating the integration contour from the real axis to the imaginary axis without changing the value of the integral. This is possible because the contour does not pass over any poles of the integrand and the integrand vanishes fast enough as the magnitude of x goes to infinity. This can be explained using the residue theorem and by considering the integral as a sum of the new rotated integral and two closed paths, whose contribution becomes zero as their radius goes to infinity.
  • #1
AndrewGRQTF
27
2
This question is about the general 1 loop correction to the propagator in QFT (this is actually not important for this question). Let's say we have an integral over an integration variable x, and this x ranges from ##-\infty## to ##\infty##. If we look at this integration contour in the complex plane, it will be along the real axis. A book that I am reading (QFT by Srednicki), says that we can rotate this contour counterclockwise onto the imaginary axis, without changing the value of the integral, and he says that this is because the contour does not pass over any poles of the integrand and that the integrand vanishes fast enough as the magnitude of x goes to infinity.

My question is: why does the value of the integral not change when we change the integration contour?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The integral of an entire function over a closed path is zero if there are no poles inside (residue theorem). If the function goes to zero sufficiently fast for large |z| you can write the original integral as sum of the new (rotated) integral plus two closed paths (two 90 degree sectors of the complex plane https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Integration-contour-in-the-complex-s-plane-to-compute-the-integral-representing-the_fig3_242423238, then let their radius go to infinity), the contribution from the closed paths is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes AndrewGRQTF
  • #3
mfb said:
The integral of an entire function over a closed path is zero if there are no poles inside (residue theorem). If the function goes to zero sufficiently fast for large |z| you can write the original integral as sum of the new (rotated) integral plus two closed paths (two 90 degree sectors of the complex plane https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Integration-contour-in-the-complex-s-plane-to-compute-the-integral-representing-the_fig3_242423238, then let their radius go to infinity), the contribution from the closed paths is zero.

Thank you.
 

1. What is integration being unchanged after rotation?

Integration being unchanged after rotation refers to the mathematical concept that the value of a definite integral remains the same even after the coordinate system is rotated. This means that the orientation of the coordinate axes does not affect the result of the integral.

2. Why is integration unchanged after rotation?

This is because the rotation of a coordinate system does not alter the shape or size of the function being integrated. The values of the function may change, but the area under the curve remains the same.

3. How does the rotation of a coordinate system affect the integration?

The rotation of a coordinate system does not affect the integration itself, but it may change the limits of integration. This is because the new orientation of the axes may result in different values for the boundaries of the integral.

4. Are there any exceptions to integration being unchanged after rotation?

Yes, there are some cases where integration may not be unchanged after rotation. This typically occurs when the function being integrated is not continuous or when the limits of integration are dependent on the orientation of the coordinate axes.

5. How is integration being unchanged after rotation useful in science?

Integration being unchanged after rotation is useful in various fields of science, such as physics and engineering, where the rotation of coordinate systems is common. It allows for easier and more accurate calculations of integrals without having to consider the orientation of the axes.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
748
  • Calculus
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
572
Replies
1
Views
632
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
854
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
600
Back
Top