Quadratic Surfaces: Substitute (a,b,c) into z=y^2-x^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Rios
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic Surfaces
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the point (a,b,c) lies on the hyperbolic paraboloid defined by the equation z=y²-x². The key conclusion is that the parametric lines x=a+t, y=b+t, z=c+2(b-a)t and x=a+t, y=b-t, z=c-2(b+a)t lie entirely on this surface, given that c=b²-a². The proof involves substituting these parametric equations into the paraboloid equation and demonstrating that the resulting expressions satisfy the equation for all values of t.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hyperbolic paraboloids and their equations
  • Familiarity with parametric equations in three-dimensional space
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly differentiation and its application in multivariable functions
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions and equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of hyperbolic paraboloids in advanced geometry
  • Learn about parametric equations and their applications in 3D modeling
  • Explore differentiation techniques for multivariable functions
  • Investigate the implications of points lying on surfaces in three-dimensional calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and engineers interested in the geometric properties of surfaces, as well as anyone studying advanced calculus or multivariable functions.

Fernando Rios
Messages
96
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
Show that if the point (a,b,c) lies on the hyperbolic paraboloid z=y^2-x^2, then the lines with parametric equations x=a+t, y=b+t, z=c+2(b-a)t and x=a+t, y=b-t, z=c-2(b+a)t both lie enterily on this paraboloid.
Relevant Equations
z=y^2-x^2
x=a+t, y=b+t, z=c+2(b-a)t and x=a+t, y=b-t, z=c-2(b+a)t
Substitute (a,b,c) into z=y^2-x^2:
c=b^2-a^2

Substitute the parametric equations of L1 into the equation of the hyperbolic paraboloid in order to find points of intersection:
z=y^2-x^2
c+2(b-a)t=(b+t)^2-(a+t)^2=b^2-a^2+(b-a)t
c=b^2-a^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fernando Rios said:
Homework Statement:: Show that if the point (a,b,c) lies on the hyperbolic paraboloid z=y^2-x^2, then the lines with parametric equations x=a+t, y=b+t, z=c+2(b-a)t and x=a+t, y=b-t, z=c-2(b+a)t both lie enterily on this paraboloid.
Relevant Equations:: z=y^2-x^2
x=a+t, y=b+t, z=c+2(b-a)t and x=a+t, y=b-t, z=c-2(b+a)t

Substitute (a,b,c) into z=y^2-x^2:
c=b^2-a^2

Substitute the parametric equations of L1 into the equation of the hyperbolic paraboloid in order to find points of intersection:
z=y^2-x^2
c+2(b-a)t=(b+t)^2-(a+t)^2=b^2-a^2+(b-a)t
c=b^2-a^2
Looks good, except that you should write it backward.

We need to show that all points ##\begin{bmatrix}
x\\y\\z \end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}a\\b\\c\end{bmatrix}+t\cdot \begin{bmatrix}
1\\ \pm 1\\ \pm 2b -2a\end{bmatrix}## obey the rule ##y^2-x^2=z.##
\begin{align*}
y^2-x^2&=(b\pm t)^2-(a+t)^2=b^2 \pm 2bt +t^2- a^2-2at-t^2\\
&=c + t(\pm 2b-2a)= c \pm 2(b\mp a)t=z
\end{align*}
Of course, you can handle both cases separately if you like that better.
 
I think it looks good except that you should state more clearly what some steps are doing.
Fernando Rios said:
Homework Statement:: Show that if the point (a,b,c) lies on the hyperbolic paraboloid z=y^2-x^2, then the lines with parametric equations x=a+t, y=b+t, z=c+2(b-a)t and x=a+t, y=b-t, z=c-2(b+a)t both lie enterily on this paraboloid.
Relevant Equations:: z=y^2-x^2
x=a+t, y=b+t, z=c+2(b-a)t and x=a+t, y=b-t, z=c-2(b+a)t

Substitute (a,b,c) into z=y^2-x^2:
c=b^2-a^2
What are you proving here? That for ##t=0, x_0, y_0, z_0## are on the hyperbolic paraboloid? If so, you should say that. Or are you just stating what it means to say that (a,b,c) is on the hyperbolic paraboloid?
You should say something like: Since (a,b,c) is on the hyperbolic parabola, ##c=b^2-a^2##.
Fernando Rios said:
Substitute the parametric equations of L1 into the equation of the hyperbolic paraboloid in order to find points of intersection:
z=y^2-x^2
c+2(b-a)t=(b+t)^2-(a+t)^2=b^2-a^2+(b-a)t
Shouldn't this be ##b^2-a^2+2(b-a)t##?
Fernando Rios said:
c=b^2-a^2
You should state what this shows. (That x, y, z, satisfy the equation of the hyperbolic paraboloid for any value of t.)
 
Last edited:
fresh_42 said:
Looks good, except that you should write it backward.

We need to show that all points ##\begin{bmatrix}
x\\y\\z \end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}a\\b\\c\end{bmatrix}+t\cdot \begin{bmatrix}
1\\ \pm 1\\ \pm 2b -2a\end{bmatrix}## obey the rule ##y^2-x^2=z.##
\begin{align*}
y^2-x^2&=(b\pm t)^2-(a+t)^2=b^2 \pm 2bt +t^2- a^2-2at-t^2\\
&=c + t(\pm 2b-2a)= c \pm 2(b\mp a)t=z
\end{align*}
Of course, you can handle both cases separately if you like that better.
Thank you for your answer.
 
FactChecker said:
I think it looks good except that you should state more clearly what some steps are doing.

What are you proving here? That for ##t=0, x_0, y_0, z_0## are on the hyperbolic paraboloid? If so, you should say that. Or are you just stating what it means to say that (a,b,c) is on the hyperbolic paraboloid?
You should say something like: Since (a,b,c) is on the hyperbolic parabola, ##c=b^2-a^2##.

Shouldn't this be ##b^2-a^2+2(b-a)t##?

You should state what this shows. (That x, y, z, satisfy the equation of the hyperbolic paraboloid for any value of t.)
Thank you for your response.
 
Alternative method:
Let f(x,y,z) = y^2 - x^2 - z. Then r(t) = (A_x,A_y,A_z)t + (a, b, c) lies entirely on the paraboloid if and only if f(r(t)) = 0. We know this is the case when t = 0 (because we are given that (a,b,c) is on the surface), so we need <br /> \begin{split}<br /> 0 &amp;= \frac{df}{dt} \\ &amp;= \frac{dr}{dt} \cdot (-2x(t), 2y(t), -1) \\<br /> &amp;= (A_x,A_y,A_z) \cdot (-2(A_xt + a), 2(A_yt + b), -1) \\<br /> &amp;= 2(A_y^2 - A_x^2)t + 2(bA_y - aA_x) - A_z <br /> \end{split} for all t. This requires A_y^2 - A_x^2 = 0 and hence <br /> (A_x,A_y,A_z) = A_x(1, \pm 1, 2(\pm b - a)). Setting A_x = 1 gives the parametrizations specified in the question.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K