Quadrupole Potential: Help Derive and Decipher This Beast

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter UAR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derive Potential
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the derivation and understanding of the quadrupole potential in the context of electrostatics, specifically how it relates to dipole potential. Participants explore the mathematical expressions involved, the meaning of the quadrupole moment tensor, and the relationships between various terms in the equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an equation involving the quadrupole moment tensor and seeks clarification on its derivation and relation to dipole potential.
  • Another participant suggests that the quadrupole potential equation can be derived by applying the dipole potential equation twice, first with the dipole moment and then with the quadrupole moment.
  • Questions arise regarding the specific meaning of the quadrupole moment tensor, with one participant expressing uncertainty about its definition and role.
  • Participants discuss the notation and implications of the terms in the equations, particularly the relationship between the dipole moment and the quadrupole moment.
  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the notation and the dependence of the dipole moment on the source points versus the field point.
  • Another participant humorously notes that the quadrupole moment tensor could represent various entities, indicating a lack of consensus on its specific definition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical relationships presented but express differing levels of understanding regarding the quadrupole moment tensor and its implications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise definition and physical interpretation of the quadrupole moment tensor.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of notation and the dependence of terms on different points in space, which may affect the clarity of the discussion.

UAR
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
[tex](\textbf{q}\bullet\nabla)(\textbf{p}\bullet\nabla)\frac{1}{r} = -(\textbf{p}\bullet\textbf{q})\frac{1}{r^{3}} + 3(\textbf{p}\bullet\textbf{r})(\textbf{q}\bullet\textbf{r})\frac{1}{r^{5}}[/tex]

r is distance between field point and dipole source, [tex]\textbf{p}[/tex] is dipole moment, and I believe [tex]\textbf{q}[/tex] may be quadrupole moment tensor (what is that anyways?),

How is the above equation derived ? and exactly how is it related to the more physically and mathematically lucid dipole potential below:

[tex](\textbf{p}\bullet\nabla)\frac{1}{r} = -(\textbf{p}\bullet\textbf{r})\frac{1}{r^{3}}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi UAR! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(use \cdot instead of \bullet :wink:)
UAR said:
[tex](\textbf{q}\bullet\nabla)(\textbf{p}\bullet\nabla)\frac{1}{r} = -(\textbf{p}\bullet\textbf{q})\frac{1}{r^{3}} + 3(\textbf{p}\bullet\textbf{r})(\textbf{q}\bullet\textbf{r})\frac{1}{r^{5}}[/tex]

r is distance between field point and dipole source, [tex]\textbf{p}[/tex] is dipole moment, and I believe [tex]\textbf{q}[/tex] may be quadrupole moment tensor (what is that anyways?),

How is the above equation derived ? and exactly how is it related to the more physically and mathematically lucid dipole potential below:

[tex](\textbf{p}\bullet\nabla)\frac{1}{r} = -(\textbf{p}\bullet\textbf{r})\frac{1}{r^{3}}[/tex]

It's derived from that equation simply by using it twice, first with p· and then with q·

(and because (q·)(p·r) = p·q :wink:)
 
Thanks Tiny-tim!

However, while you are still online, excuse my slowness: why is:

[tex](\textbf{q}\cdot\nabla)(\textbf{p}\cdot\textbf{r})=\textbf{p}\cdot\textbf{q}[/tex] ?
 
UAR said:
why is:

[tex](\textbf{q}\cdot\nabla)(\textbf{p}\cdot\textbf{r})=\textbf{p}\cdot\textbf{q}[/tex] ?

Because p.r = xpx + ypy + zpz,

so (q·∇)(p.r) = … ? :smile:
 
Aaah! Thanks! I was hesitant to do that due to a (poor notation)-induced irrational fear that [tex]p_{x'}[/tex] was a function of [tex]x[/tex]. But now I see it is not, since [tex]\nabla[/tex] is w.r.t field point [tex]\textbf{r}[/tex], while [tex]\textbf{p}[/tex] depends only on source pts [tex]\textbf{r'}[/tex].

One more question: What is [tex]\textbf{q}[/tex] ?

By the way, you are truly a good mentor. Thanks for your help and keep up the great work!
 
UAR said:
One more question: What is [tex]\textbf{q}[/tex] ?

No idea :rolleyes: … it could be anything, and the equation would still work :wink:
 
Hi Tiny Tim,

Thanks for your help and for your honesty.

Anyone else care to help physically and mathematically elucidate [tex]\textbf{q}[/tex] in the quadrupole potential equation above. I read somewhere that it is called (or is related to ?) the "quadrupole moment tensor" (what exactly is that by the way?).

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K