Quantisation of light and Doppler effect

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
Vibin Narayanan
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Light consists of quanta(small packets of energy). Then how do we explain doppler effect of light the same way we do for sound? What is the valid explanation of light doppler effect which is consistent with the photon picture?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Vibin Narayanan said:
Light consists of quanta(small packets of energy). Then how do we explain doppler effect of light the same way we do for sound? What is the valid explanation of light doppler effect which is consistent with the photon picture?
The frequency of the photon (and hence its energy) is frame-dependent.
 
DrClaude said:
The frequency of the photon (and hence its energy) is frame-dependent.
That's it? I simply didn't get it. Energy changing with the motion of source or observer or both, doesn't violate conservation of energy?
 
Energy is conserved, but it is dependent on the frame. For example, I will measure a ball moving relative to me as having kinetic energy, but in a frame co-moving with the ball, it will have none.
 
Vibin Narayanan said:
That's it? I simply didn't get it. Energy changing with the motion of source or observer or both, doesn't violate conservation of energy?

Nope. Consider yourself in a car moving down the road. If another car comes up behind you 1 mph faster than you're going and taps your bumper, your car is not totaled, despite the fact that you both may be traveling 70+ mph.