Quantitative reasoning problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantitative reasoning problem involving the construction of numbers using specific rules and a limited set of integers. Participants are exploring the implications of creating numbers from a small set of values and the validity of the proposed construction rules.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity and meaningfulness of the construction rules presented, particularly regarding the ability to generate numbers from a limited set of integers. There is a focus on whether a consistent rule can be applied across multiple examples.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants expressing confusion and skepticism about the examples provided. Some participants are suggesting that a single rule should apply to all examples, while others are questioning the overall purpose of the exercise. There is no clear consensus, and the conversation appears to be exploring various interpretations of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note a lack of clarity in the original poster's examples and express concern over the absence of additional information that might clarify the construction rules. There is an acknowledgment of the potential for arbitrary number generation from a small set of integers.

Chijioke
Messages
14
Reaction score
3
New poster has been reminded to show their work when posting schoolwork type questions
Homework Statement
Study the examples and use it to find the missing numbers.
Relevant Equations
If the relationship in the examples can be deduced, looking for the missing numbers would not be a problem.
IMG_20231104_112510.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can find a construction rule for any number. There are no unambiguous answers. Example:

1699189441157.png


Answer: ##87##
Reason: ##.\overline{1}^{-2}+3!=87##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: e_jane and jim mcnamara
fresh_42 said:
You can find a construction rule for any number. There are no unambiguous answers. Example:

View attachment 334861

Answer: ##87##
Reason: ##.\overline{1}^{-2}+3!=87##
I don't understand.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Chijioke said:
I don't understand.
I gave you an example how to produce the number ##87## by a construction rule that only used the three numbers ##\{1,2,3\}.## Isn't that absurd? You can create a lot of numbers from three given ones.

There is either an explanation about that specific arrangement with four numbers that you haven't told us or it is a worthless and meaningless exercise. You could write down any number in the empty fields and construct a rule afterward.
 
It has to be the same one rule for the three examples on top, I guess. Then the same rule should be applied in the other twelve.
 
Hill said:
It has to be the same one rule for the three examples on top, I guess. Then the same rule should be applied in the other twelve.
Before we keep guessing, and with respect to the fact that the OP didn't try to help himself or us, I will close this thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: e_jane and topsquark

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K