Quantization of electromagnetic field

  • #1
87
1
Hello everybody,

It is known that electric field operator is shown as

[itex]\hat{E}(r,t)=-i\sum_{k,\lambda}\sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega_k}{2\epsilon V}}\left(a(t)^\dagger_{k,\lambda} e^{-ik.r} - a(t)_{k,\lambda} e^{ik.r} \right) \hat{e}_{k,\lambda}[/itex]

But if I need to represent an electrostatic field in a quantized form, how to proceed?

Thank you everybody.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
87
1
Please.
 
  • #3
588
43
Apparently you have mixed in your expression above the electric field in the quantized and not quantized forms. AFAIK the electric field operator(electrostatic field is not a meaningful distinction here) is: ##E(r)=i\sum_{k,\lambda}\sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega}{2\epsilon V}}\left(ξ(\lambda)a^{(\lambda)}(k) e^{ik.r} - ξ(\lambda)a^{\dagger(\lambda)}(k) e^{-ik.r} \right) ##
 
Last edited:
  • #4
87
1
Apparently you have mixed in your expression above the electric field in the quantized and not quantized forms. AFAIK the electric field operator(electrostatic field is not a meaningful distinction here) is: ##E(r)=i\sum_{k,\lambda}\sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega}{2\epsilon V}}\left(ξ(\lambda)a^{(\lambda)}(k) e^{ik.r} - ξ(\lambda)a^{\dagger(\lambda)}(k) e^{-ik.r} \right) ##
Thank you for your response.
All of electromagnetic field quantization still really dark for me. I don't even know what question I have to ask. So, static field are not define in quantum field formulation?
(excuse for my english)

Thanks.
Konte
 

Related Threads on Quantization of electromagnetic field

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
638
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
649
Top