Quantum cloning and disentanglement

  • Thread starter Thread starter nordinz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cloning Quantum
nordinz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question with regard to the outcome of approximate quantum cloning:

For a general input state, it will always be entangled, right?
Let s = a|0> + b|1>

Then using say a Wootters-Zurek copying machine, we have:
|s>|Q> -> a|0>|0>|Q_0> + b|1>|1>|Q_1>

I need to perform some operations and measurements on the clones, but I need the states to be disentangled.
Is this possible? Any advice on how it should be done?

Thanks.
Nordin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not even possible to clone due to the no-cloning theorem.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top