Quantum Coherence - Decoherence Question

Click For Summary
As the number of entangled particles increases, their quantum properties diminish, leading to a classical behavior where the collective position-space wavefunction appears collapsed. The uncertainty principle suggests that this collapse results in an expanded momentum-space wavefunction, but for macroscopic objects like a baseball, these extensions are negligible compared to the object's size and average momentum. Consequently, while individual particle positions may vary slightly, these uncertainties effectively cancel out, keeping the baseball's position highly predictable. The probability of all particles in a baseball deviating significantly from their expected positions is astronomically low. Thus, while classical objects can be viewed through the lens of quantum mechanics, their behavior remains practically classical due to decoherence.
burke142
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So I understand that as the number of entangled particles increases, observable quantum mechanical properties decrease to the extent that the mass of particles collectively loses its wave-particle character and behaves classically.

In other words, the particles' collective position-space wavefunction is effectively collapsed.

My question is this: if a classical object is functionally a collapsed position-space wavefunction, doesn't the uncertainty principle hold that the object would have a correspondingly expanded momentum-space wavefunction?

If so, would a classical object, let's say a baseball, have a single measurable momentum space wavefunction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
burke142 said:
My question is this: if a classical object is functionally a collapsed position-space wavefunction, doesn't the uncertainty principle hold that the object would have a correspondingly expanded momentum-space wavefunction?

If so, would a classical object, let's say a baseball, have a single measurable momentum space wavefunction?
A wave function of a macroscopic object such as baseball will be extended in both position and momentum. The point is that both extensions are negligibly small when compared with the size of the object and average momentum of the object. So for all practical purposes you may pretend that there is no extension at all.
 
burke142 said:
If so, would a classical object, let's say a baseball, have a single measurable momentum space wavefunction?

Only if the wave functions of all the individual particles are coherent - but of course they aren't, which is why we call it "decoherence".

[warning! - what follows is a very handwavy and semi-classical way of thinking about a multi-particle quantum system - do not build too much on top of it! Read the wikipedia article on quantum decoherence if you want the real thing!]

There is some uncertainty as to the position of each individual particle but on average the uncertainties cancel out. Some particles will be a bit to the left of where they "belong" and others a bit to the right, and at any given moment the numbers of both will be approximately equal so the baseball as a whole stays very close to its expected position with a very high probability.

How high? Well, the baseball contains something on the order of ##10^{25}## atoms and the probability of them all randomly "deciding" to be a noticeable distance to the left at the same time is on the order of ##2^{(-10^{25})}##, a number that is unimaginably (quite literally - you can't imagine it) small.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
833
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K