Quantum effects at the neurological level

Click For Summary
Quantum effects at the neurological level are largely dismissed by experts in quantum chemistry and biology, who view the theories proposed by figures like Penrose and Hameroff as speculative and pseudoscientific. Critics argue that these ideas are promoted by individuals outside the relevant scientific fields, undermining their credibility. The discussion shifts to the "mystery of consciousness," with some participants emphasizing that understanding consciousness should be the domain of neurologists and cognitive scientists rather than physicists. While notable scientists have explored the intersection of quantum mechanics and consciousness, there is skepticism about the validity of these connections. Overall, the consensus is that consciousness is a complex phenomenon that may not require quantum explanations.
  • #61
In some hopes that it might improve this train wreck of conversation, I wanted to add this:

Although "consciousness" seems to be a complex higher brain function that can be described in terms of the laws of chemistry and complex electromagnetic systems without needing to go into any fundamental quantum stuff...

Free will is incompatible with classical physics, but it is entirely compatible with quantum mechanics. In quantum physics, even electrons can have free will. (this is subject to your interpretation of quantum mechanics)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Thankx, I kinda got to that last weekend after I did some more reasearch within it. Its rather fasiniting actully. I mean if you think about black holes they seem to lure a lot of attention so to speak. As in, if there was a black hole in space all matter would be in one place.
 
  • #63
The philosophical motivation behind the quantum-consciousness link is the "measurement problem" (from SEP: "von Neumann's motivation for introducing collapse was to save what he called psycho-physical parallelism (arguably supervenience of the mental on the physical: only one mental state is experienced, so there should be only one corresponding component in the physical state").

Just replace the term consciousness with experience (and avoid using terms like phenomenal and qualia) and you have yourself a foundations of physics paper even 't Hooft would enjoy. I happen to think it's an interesting philosophical problem but I'll stick to the "classical" stuff when I'm doing neurophysiology.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
607
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
12K