Quantum Effects Brought to Light

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of Bell's inequality in quantum mechanics, particularly regarding the role of entanglement and amplification. The article referenced discusses how the violation of Bell's inequality is contingent upon the preservation of entanglement prior to amplification. The key insight shared is that knowing the polarization state of photons before amplification does not lead to a violation of Bell's inequality, while after amplification, the expected violation occurs. This distinction highlights the critical nature of entanglement in quantum experiments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bell's inequality in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with quantum entanglement concepts
  • Knowledge of photon polarization and measurement techniques
  • Basic comprehension of quantum amplification processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Bell's theorem in quantum information theory
  • Study the effects of quantum entanglement on measurement outcomes
  • Explore the principles of quantum amplification and its applications
  • Investigate experimental setups that demonstrate Bell's inequality violations
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and students studying advanced quantum theory will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the nuances of entanglement and its experimental verification.

StevieTNZ
Messages
1,944
Reaction score
837
"Quantum Effects Brought to Light"

Have had this article for a while now - http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110428/full/news.2011.252.html - but I was wondering why you wouldn't expect Bell's inequality to be violated had the entanglement been broken before amplification. The results, prior to amplification, and when we see which polarisation the field of photons are in, are the same - so what is different about knowing the result before amplification and after, where after amplification you wouldn't expect the inequality to be violated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Stupid boy has realized why this is so, after much thinking. Man, I can be an idiot sometimes.
 

Similar threads

Graduate Quantum properties and Van Hove singularty
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
561
Graduate Is delayed choice remote entanglement of photons derived from TDSE?
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
High School Bell inequality test without polarisation?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Undergrad Is this a valid quantum Cheshire cat?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Undergrad New Nobel Aspect contradicts himself on action at a distance bel
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Graduate Unitary Quantum Cloner: Micro-Macro Entanglement & CHSH Inequality
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate Is the freedom-of-choice loophole valid in quantum entanglement experiments?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
High School Is there another workable interpretation of the Bell Inequality?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Graduate Call for experiment : Delayed Choice and Quantum Zeno Effect
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
High School Is a Quantum Entanglement Camera the Key to Seeing Into the Future of Earth?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K