Quantum entanglement - what attributes are entangled?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the attributes that can be entangled in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the nature of quantum entanglement and its implications. Participants explore various properties of particles that may exhibit entanglement, including spin, kinetic energy, and other observable characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about which attributes of particles are entangled, mentioning spin as a known example and questioning if kinetic energy and energy states are also entangled.
  • Another participant asserts that quantum entanglement is a mathematical explanation that is not universally accepted, suggesting that one can benefit from quantum mechanics without fully endorsing this view.
  • In response, a participant emphasizes that entanglement is a fundamental aspect of quantum theory, supported by experimental evidence and Bell's Theorem, which rules out many alternative explanations.
  • Further contributions suggest that almost any observable property can be entangled, not limited to spin or momentum, and provide examples of entanglement involving various particles and states.
  • One participant mentions that all matter exists in some entangled state almost all of the time, indicating a broad scope of entanglement in nature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is disagreement regarding the acceptance of quantum entanglement as a universally valid concept. While some participants argue for its fundamental status in quantum mechanics, others question the consensus on its interpretation.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about specific attributes that can be entangled and the implications of entanglement in various contexts. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and assumptions about the nature of quantum entanglement.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring quantum mechanics, particularly students and enthusiasts seeking to understand the complexities of quantum entanglement and its implications in physics.

TrifePhysics
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello there!

I´ve tried searching the internet but seems to be in need of a heavy book for this answer. I stumbled upon this forum and decided I would love to ask some Experts here :-)
Basically what attributes are quantum entangled?

I know that spin is, but is fx kinetic energy? Are energy states entangled? If one decomposes, does the other as well?

And I need a Little explanation as well :-)

Quantum entanglement basically mean that two particles are entangled to a net-zero sum, where if a value on particle A moves up, particle B moves down. - correct?
And are there other aspects to quantum entanglement in terms of how particles are entangled?

Just need an explanation in Words, not math (though I know that will give a more thorough understanding, but also takes a lot longer for you guys to explain)

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quantum entanglement is an explanation of the maths, not one that is universally accepted. You can enjoy the benefits of quantum mechanics without subscribing to that point of view.
 
Hi gadong!

I know - but because it explains some math it leads to some assumptions of how Things Work. To the best of my knowledge there´s been experiments where you entangle two particles, which actually Works.
I would mainly like to know which attributes of a particle is entangled? Fx the locality/position of the particle is not entangled, I know spin is entangled - but what other attributes of a particle is entangled? Velocity? Temperature/kinetic energy?
 
gadong said:
Quantum entanglement is an explanation of the maths, not one that is universally accepted. You can enjoy the benefits of quantum mechanics without subscribing to that point of view.

That is a terrible comment. Much like saying general relativity is not universally accepted.

The fact is that entanglement is predicted by QM, and experiments confirm those predictions. Bell's Theorem rules out most explanations outside of QM. Entanglement IS generally accepted and has been.
 
DrChinese said:
That is a terrible comment. Much like saying general relativity is not universally accepted.

The fact is that entanglement is predicted by QM, and experiments confirm those predictions. Bell's Theorem rules out most explanations outside of QM. Entanglement IS generally accepted and has been.

Sorry, I accept that criticism.
 
I would like to add this comment to the OP's question as to WHAT can be entangled.

Basically, almost anything observable can be entangled!

It is NOT limited to spin, momentum, position, energy, etc. You can entangle electron holes (is that entangling nothing?), combinations of observables, even combinations of different particles. Usually, some Bell Inequality is derived and violated by prediction of QM, and sometimes experiments are done to demonstrate same. A few esoteric examples:

Entanglement of Two Atoms using Rydberg Blockade
http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.5328

Electron-Hole Entanglement in a Quantum Spin Hall Insulator
http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.1207

Etc.

I would estimate on the order of 1,000 different somethings have been shown to be entangled at least in principle. As to the everyday existence of entangled objects: every quark in normal matter is entangled with its 2 siblings; and every electron in the lowest shell is entangled with its partner in that shell. So basically all matter exists in some entangled state almost all of the time.
 
Thank you Vanheese for the links - I had already read those pages though :-)
What DrChinese wrote was exactly the answer I was looking for - thanks a bunch!

Looking forward to delving further into the World of QM!
I´ll definitely stay on this forum!

Cheers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
420
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K