Undergrad Quantum Eraser Experiment at home

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of conducting the quantum eraser experiment at home, highlighting concerns about the complexity and cost of necessary equipment. A guide from Scientific American is referenced, which claims to represent the quantum eraser experiment, but skepticism arises regarding its authenticity. Participants express doubts about whether the experiment genuinely demonstrates quantum erasure or merely illustrates interference patterns of polarized light. The moderator clarifies that the guide does not relate to quantum erasure and criticizes the misleading terminology used regarding photons and laser light. Overall, the consensus leans towards skepticism about the guide's validity in demonstrating the quantum eraser concept.
Bila
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Is this guide for conducting a quatum erase experiment (observer effect), really accurate, or does it in fact demonstrate somethingt diffent than that?
I was tryingt to find away to build a setup for conducting the quantum erase experiment, demonstrating the observer effect. It seemed impossible without expensive equipment for sending single photont and detecting single photons, then however I bumbed into this guide from scientific american (see link below). It definetly claims to represent the quantum eraser experiment, but I anyway got a bit suspicious. Is it really? Or is it rather just showint that light with different polarization do not interfere with each other? I cant really make out if its genuion or not, so any input would be highly appreciated.

Here is the guide:

Moderator's note: link to copyrighted material removed. It is available with a subscription at https://www.scientificamerican.com/issue/sa/2007/05-01/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct in thinking that this as nothing to do with quantum erasure. I also really hate that they keep talking about photons, while the light source is a laser, which is the most classical light you can have.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
47
Views
25K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K