I Quantum Eraser Experiment at home

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of conducting the quantum eraser experiment at home, highlighting concerns about the complexity and cost of necessary equipment. A guide from Scientific American is referenced, which claims to represent the quantum eraser experiment, but skepticism arises regarding its authenticity. Participants express doubts about whether the experiment genuinely demonstrates quantum erasure or merely illustrates interference patterns of polarized light. The moderator clarifies that the guide does not relate to quantum erasure and criticizes the misleading terminology used regarding photons and laser light. Overall, the consensus leans towards skepticism about the guide's validity in demonstrating the quantum eraser concept.
Bila
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Is this guide for conducting a quatum erase experiment (observer effect), really accurate, or does it in fact demonstrate somethingt diffent than that?
I was tryingt to find away to build a setup for conducting the quantum erase experiment, demonstrating the observer effect. It seemed impossible without expensive equipment for sending single photont and detecting single photons, then however I bumbed into this guide from scientific american (see link below). It definetly claims to represent the quantum eraser experiment, but I anyway got a bit suspicious. Is it really? Or is it rather just showint that light with different polarization do not interfere with each other? I cant really make out if its genuion or not, so any input would be highly appreciated.

Here is the guide:

Moderator's note: link to copyrighted material removed. It is available with a subscription at https://www.scientificamerican.com/issue/sa/2007/05-01/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct in thinking that this as nothing to do with quantum erasure. I also really hate that they keep talking about photons, while the light source is a laser, which is the most classical light you can have.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K