I Quantum Eraser Experiment at home

Bila
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Is this guide for conducting a quatum erase experiment (observer effect), really accurate, or does it in fact demonstrate somethingt diffent than that?
I was tryingt to find away to build a setup for conducting the quantum erase experiment, demonstrating the observer effect. It seemed impossible without expensive equipment for sending single photont and detecting single photons, then however I bumbed into this guide from scientific american (see link below). It definetly claims to represent the quantum eraser experiment, but I anyway got a bit suspicious. Is it really? Or is it rather just showint that light with different polarization do not interfere with each other? I cant really make out if its genuion or not, so any input would be highly appreciated.

Here is the guide:

Moderator's note: link to copyrighted material removed. It is available with a subscription at https://www.scientificamerican.com/issue/sa/2007/05-01/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct in thinking that this as nothing to do with quantum erasure. I also really hate that they keep talking about photons, while the light source is a laser, which is the most classical light you can have.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top