B Quantum Field Theory As Simple As Possible

Click For Summary
Quantum Field Theory As Simple As Possible by Andrew Zee is praised for its accessibility, requiring only high school-level math, making it suitable for younger readers interested in complex physics concepts. The book is considered a unique resource, especially since quantum field theory is rarely taught at lower educational levels. While some find Zee's other work, Quantum Field Theory In A Nutshell, less appealing, this particular book stands out for its clarity. The discussion highlights a desire to inspire students and explore the fundamental nature of reality through this text. Overall, it is recommended for those seeking an approachable introduction to quantum field theory.
Messages
10,947
Reaction score
3,821
I don't know why, but I purchased Quantum Field Theory As Simple As Possible by Andrew Zee.

I actually like it (not so much his other book Quantum Field Theory In A Nutshell). The purpose of this post is to mention that while math is required, it is nothing beyond a HS or even advanced middle school student. Considering the importance of the material, rarely, if ever taught at this level, I think it a unique resource for our younger readers interested in what, as far as we can tell today, reality actually is. Of course anyone can read it, but the younger people on this forum should consider getting a copy. It is at a level above Rodney Brooks - Fields of Colour, which, while I also think is a decent beginner book, I have issues with.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes TSny, JC_Silver, weirdoguy and 3 others
Physics news on Phys.org
I still have trauma after his group theory book...

giphya.gif

But I'll give it a try, because I love everything QFT related, and I'm thinking about writing something for my students, so maybe that will be an inspiration.
 

Attachments

  • giphya.gif
    giphya.gif
    995.5 KB · Views: 32
I've been looking for something like this! I'll check out where I can get it.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
395
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K