Quantum: Finding time derivative of momentum operator in terms of V(x)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding an expression for the time derivative of the momentum operator in terms of the potential V(x). The original poster is exploring approaches related to quantum mechanics and the mathematical framework of Hilbert spaces, particularly in the context of Ehrenfest's theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using calculus to derive the time derivative of the momentum operator, with suggestions to start from the integral for the expectation value of momentum. There are mentions of applying the time derivative to the wave function and considerations of conservation of probability.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to relate the time derivative of momentum to the potential V(x). Some participants have provided hints and guidance on how to proceed, while others are questioning their understanding of the underlying principles and calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the class has not yet covered advanced mathematical techniques involving Hilbert spaces, which may limit the methods available for solving the problem. There is also a reference to boundary conditions that may need to be considered in the calculations.

Gza
Messages
446
Reaction score
0
Hi all, got a little caught up in tonights homework assignment; which basically reads:

Find an expression for \frac {d<\hat{p}>} {dt} in terms of V(x).

I had a few ideas from my math methods for theoretical phys. class i took a few quarters ago, involving applying the derivative operator to the already derived momentum operator, but so far this class hasn't really tackled any kind of math involving working inside hilbert spaces, so i think a strictly calc based approach may be necessary here. Any hints would be appreciated here, ty you all for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes this is usually done using just calc. So for starters write down the integral for <p> and take it's time derivative. If you've done the proof on how the time derivative of psi squared is zero you'll know what to do after that.
 
So you're trying to find one of Ehrenfest's theorems, right...? From the form of the potential, you've already chosen the Hilbert space to be L^{2}\left(\mathbb{R}\rihgt) and now remember the definition of the average of an observable on the quantum state \psi (x).

Daniel.
 
inha said:
Yes this is usually done using just calc. So for starters write down the integral for <p> and take it's time derivative. If you've done the proof on how the time derivative of psi squared is zero you'll know what to do after that.

I've actually worked out the the derivative for psi squared (in the derivation of the momentum operator using calc), and it turned out not to be zero; I got this:

<br /> \newcommand{\pd}[3]{ \frac{ \partial^{#3}{#1} }{ \partial {#2}^{#3} } }<br /> \pd{(\Psi^*\Psi)}{t}{} = \frac{i\hbar^2}{2 m}\left( \Psi^*\pd{\Psi}{x}{2} - \pd{\Psi^*}{x}{2}\Psi \right)

Taking this into the integral for the computation of the derivative of the expectation value of position (classically the velocity,) we end up recognizing the momentum operator we all know and love (multiplying by an m of course). Now the problem i have is with the actual time derivative of <p>, and how to relate it to V(x). I'm not exactly sure how to start it. Thanks for the help again.
 
Last edited:
I expressed myself poorly. That's indeed nonzero. I meant to referr to conservation of probability or that the that the wave function stays normalized as time passes. So if you integrate that over all space it goes to zero.

Anyways, as in doing that you'll have now to solve the time derivatives of psi from Schrödingers equation and plug those into the integral for <p> and then use the approperiate boundary conditions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K