Deriving <v> from <x> - Introductory Quantum Mechanics

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
rem1618
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
(First post, hi everyone.)
I'm reading Griffith's textbook on intro to quantum mech right now. After establishing the following equation

$$\left\langle f(x) \right\rangle = \int f(x)p(x)\,dx$$

And thus

$$\left\langle x \right\rangle = \int x|\Psi|^2\,dx$$

He goes on to find ##\left\langle v \right\rangle## by taking the derivative with respect to time, and he writes

$$\frac{d\left\langle x \right\rangle}{dt} = \int x\frac{\delta}{\delta t}|\Phi|^2\,dx$$

which I don't completely understand. Why isn't the x inside the partial derivative? I'm not sure if it's a physical or mathematical concept I'm not grasping here.

I first thought x is the position, so it could be a function of time and written as x(t), but then I figure maybe x(t) doesn't really have any meaning from the statistical perspective. If it can be pulled out of that derivative, then it's just a...constant? Is there a physical meaning to that x or is it just an operator tool that makes the math work out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Each state of definite x has an associated value of x, which is the x position that the state represents. It is this value of x which appears in the integral to find the average (weighted mean) of the observable x. It's something that is fixed - each definite x position state has an associated x value, which is the value of x that this state represents. The changes in state are changes in [itex]\psi[/itex] - but the correspondence between eigenvectors and eigenvalues remains fixed.

Here are some examples

[itex]\mid x_1\rangle[/itex] represents the state of being at [itex]x_1[/itex]. Suppose our wave function is 100% at [itex]x_1[/itex]. Then [itex]\mid \psi \rangle = \mid x_1 \rangle[/itex]

[tex]\langle \hat{x}\rangle =x_1 \langle x_1 \mid x_1 \rangle = x_1[/tex]

if instead we had [itex]\mid \psi \rangle = a_1(t)\mid x_1 \rangle + a_2(t)\mid x_2 \rangle[/itex]

[tex]\langle \hat{x}\rangle = x_1|a_1(t)|^2 + x_2|a_2(t)|^2[/tex]

So we have a weighted average of positions [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex]. I wouldn't make sense to have [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex] change with time.

The integral [itex]\left\langle x \right\rangle = \int x|\Psi(x)|^2\,dx[/itex] is like this only instead of two positions there are infinitely many.

The eigenvalue (which is the value of position) [itex]x_1[/itex] will always correspond to the state [itex]\mid x_1 \rangle[/itex]. Hopefully this will make sense and be intuitive.
 
Last edited:
That helped a lot. Thank you :]