Quantum Mechanics 3D harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the normalized ground-state energy eigenfunction for a three-dimensional harmonic oscillator, specifically using the potential \( V(r) = \frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 r^2 \). Participants are exploring the use of separation of variables in spherical coordinates and are questioning the orbital angular momentum of the ground state.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of separation of variables and express confusion about starting points. Some mention the need to convert Cartesian coordinates to spherical coordinates, while others suggest reviewing the Schrödinger equation in spherical coordinates.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their understanding of separation of variables and the Schrödinger equation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the conversion to spherical coordinates and the structure of the wave function, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of clarity regarding the method of separation of variables, and some participants are encouraged to refer to their quantum mechanics textbooks for additional context, particularly regarding similar problems like the hydrogen atom.

sbaseball
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
What is the normalized ground-state energy eigenfunction for the three-dimensional harmonic oscillator

V(r) = 1/2 m* ω^2 * r^2

Use separation of varaibles strategy. Express the wave function in spherical coordinates. What is the orbital angualar momentum of the ground state? Explain?

I am having a lot of trouble even knowing where to start. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you seen Schrödinger's Equation in spherical coordinates before (e.g., the Hydrogen atom)?
 
Yes I have. A long equation with partial derivatives
 
The problem tells you what to do. If you don't know what separation of variables is, I'd say start there by reading up about it.
 
I use separation of variables with regards to the r component? x^2 + y^2 + z^2 and then use the schrondiger equation and solve it that way? by converting the x y and z component into sperhical coordinates?
 
sbaseball said:
I use separation of variables with regards to the r component? x^2 + y^2 + z^2 and then use the schrondiger equation and solve it that way? by converting the x y and z component into sperhical coordinates?

nono
Convert everything into spherical polar coordinates first, that wat the r component is just the r component, working with x^2+y^2+z^2 isn't really useful here (the potential is already in given spherical polar coordinates anyway, why convert back to cartesian?)

Once you have done that, schrodingers equation should look something like the laplacian in spherical polar coordinates.
Then you use separation of variables \Psi (r,\theta,\phi)= R(r)Y(\theta,\phi) and go from there
 
sbaseball said:
I use separation of variables with regards to the r component? x^2 + y^2 + z^2 and then use the schrondiger equation and solve it that way? by converting the x y and z component into sperhical coordinates?
It's clear from what you wrote you don't understand what the method of separation of variables is, so I'll repeat my suggestion to read up on it.

Your quantum mechanics textbook should cover how to solve the Schrödinger equation for the hydrogen atom. This problem is very similar to that one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K