Quantum Mechanics - Addition of Angular Momentum

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the complexities of adding angular momentum in quantum mechanics, particularly for two j=1 systems. Participants clarify that the allowed values for total angular momentum J and its projection M must be determined correctly, emphasizing that for J=1, only the states |1 1>, |1 0>, and |1 -1> exist. The confusion arises when attempting to apply the raising operator J_+ to obtain |1 2>, which results in zero, highlighting the importance of understanding the constraints on J and M. Additionally, the conversation touches on the implications of identical versus non-identical particles, noting that identical particles require symmetric states due to the Pauli exclusion principle. The discussion concludes with a focus on constructing states of lowest energy from given wave functions.
Tangent87
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Just when I think I've understood addition of angular momentum, I find a problem that completely questions everything I think I know. Okay so here's the problem: question 3/II/32D on page 68 http://www.maths.cam.ac.uk/undergrad/pastpapers/2005/Part_2/list_II.pdf .

For the possible values of J and M as I understand it, j_1+j_2\geq J\geq|j_1-j_2|,~j_1+j_2\geq M\geq-(j_1+j_2) and therefore for two j=1 systems surely J=2,1, or 0 and M=-2,-1,0,1,2?

Thus we must find expressions for the states |1~ 2\rangle ,~|1 ~1\rangle ,~|1 ~0\rangle ,~|1 ~-1\rangle ,~and |1 ~-2\rangle ,~?

So letting |1~m_1\rangle |1~m_2\rangle=|m_1\rangle|m_2\rangle where m_i=\pm 1, we start with the top state J=2:

|2~2\rangle=|1\rangle|1\rangle

Then apply J_- to get |2~ 1\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle|1\rangle+|1\rangle|0\rangle).

Orthog. combination gives us a J=1 state: |1 ~1\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle|1\rangle-|1\rangle|0\rangle). But if we try and apply J_+ to this in order to get |1 ~2\rangle we just get zero, why? How do we get |1 ~2\rangle?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Tangent87 said:
Just when I think I've understood addition of angular momentum, I find a problem that completely questions everything I think I know. Okay so here's the problem: question 3/II/32D on page 68 http://www.maths.cam.ac.uk/undergrad/pastpapers/2005/Part_2/list_II.pdf .

For the possible values of J and M as I understand it, j_1+j_2\geq J\geq|j_1-j_2|,~j_1+j_2\geq M\geq-(j_1+j_2) and therefore for two j=1 systems surely J=2,1, or 0 and M=-2,-1,0,1,2?
That's not quite correct. First you find the allowed values for J. Then for each value of J, M runs from -J to +J. So for this problem, since you're interested in J=1, you only have the states |1 1>, |1 0>, and |1 -1>. There are no other J=1 states (so it should make sense to you why you got 0 when you applied J+ below).
Thus we must find expressions for the states |1~ 2\rangle ,~|1 ~1\rangle ,~|1 ~0\rangle ,~|1 ~-1\rangle ,~and |1 ~-2\rangle ,~?

So letting |1~m_1\rangle |1~m_2\rangle=|m_1\rangle|m_2\rangle where m_i=\pm 1, we start with the top state J=2:

|2~2\rangle=|1\rangle|1\rangle

Then apply J_- to get |2~ 1\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle|1\rangle+|1\rangle|0\rangle).

Orthog. combination gives us a J=1 state: |1 ~1\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle|1\rangle-|1\rangle|0\rangle). But if we try and apply J_+ to this in order to get |1 ~2\rangle we just get zero, why? How do we get |1 ~2\rangle?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
vela said:
That's not quite correct. First you find the allowed values for J. Then for each value of J, M runs from -J to +J. So for this problem, since you're interested in J=1, you only have the states |1 1>, |1 0>, and |1 -1>. There are no other J=1 states (so it should make sense to you why you got 0 when you applied J+ below).

Ah I see, yes that makes sense. Also I don't understand the second paragraph of the question, I guess I need to understand what's the difference between identical and non-identical particles?
 
Right. It has to do with the Pauli exclusion principle and the symmetry of the wave function.
 
vela said:
Right. It has to do with the Pauli exclusion principle and the symmetry of the wave function.

Ok I have read this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identical_particles and I think I'm starting to understand. So if the particles are identical the state must be symmetric since the antisymmetric state would be zero. And if the particles are non-identical the state can be either symmetric or anti-symmetric? Is that logic correct?
 
Yes, that's right.
 
vela said:
Yes, that's right.

So then how do we construct the states, we're given \psi_i(x) and told that we have to construct states of lowest energy (i.e. E_1) so do we only care about \psi_1^A(x) and \psi_1^B(x)?
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
987
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K