Quantum mechanics - creation and annihilation operators

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the expression <n|p^2|n> for the quantized harmonic oscillator, where p is the momentum operator. Participants clarify that the momentum operator can be expressed in terms of creation and annihilation operators, leading to the relation p = (-i/sqrt{2})(a - a+). The evaluation involves applying the momentum operator to the state |n> and using the self-adjoint property of p to derive <n|p^2|n> = <n|p^†p|n>. The final result obtained is n + 1/2, confirming the calculation's correctness while emphasizing the importance of self-adjoint operators in quantum mechanics.
Anabelle37
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Evaluate <n|p^2|n>
where p is the momentum operator for the quantised harmonic oscillator.

Homework Equations



creation operator: a+|n>=sqrt(n+1)|n+1>
annihilation operator: a|n>=sqrt(n)|n-1>

The Attempt at a Solution



the operator p can be defined in terms of the creation and annihilation operators, ie. p = (-i/sqrt{2})(a-a+)

I also wrote down that for the quantised harmonic oscillator p = -(ihbar).(partial derivative wrt x) and so p^2= -(hbar)^2.(partial derivative wrt x)^2

I'm stuck on what to do next? How do I evaluate <n|p^2|n> ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
use the fact that \left| n \right\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{n!}} (a^{\dagger})^n \left| 0 \right\rangle and then use the commutation relations for the a's

note you will need to workout [a^n, a^{\dagger}] and other similar ones write if you have trouble
 
What do you get if you apply p to |n>?

\vert\psi\rangle = \hat{p}\vert n\rangle = \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}(\hat{a}^\dagger-\hat{a})\vert n\rangle = \cdots

Once you have that, you can use the fact that p is self-adjoint so that

\langle \psi \vert \psi \rangle = \langle n \vert \hat{p}^\dagger \hat{p} \vert n \rangle = \langle n \vert \hat{p}^2 \vert n \rangle

You could also do it the way sgd37 suggested, but it's a bit more tedious for this particular problem.
 
Thank you both! Vela I had done it a longer way and then just realized your way would have been so much easier lol oh well. What does self adjoint mean again?

I got n+1/2 as my answer which i think is correct!?
 
That's what I got. Don't forget to add the units back in if necessary. You're using the dimensionless version of the momentum operator.
 
A self-adjoint operator \hat{A} is an operator for which
\hat{A}^\dagger = \hat{A} (there are also some technical requisites, but they shouldn't concern you now). Since all self-adjoint operators have real eigenvalues, they correspond to observables (which have real values when measured). On the other way round, an observable must therefore be self-adjoint, and so the position operator \hat{x} and the momentum operator \hat{p} are postulated to be self-adjoint.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K