Quantum Mechanics (finding the Hamiltonian of a quantum top)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Hamiltonian for a quantum top, particularly in the context of a charged top placed in a constant magnetic field. The original poster describes their initial approach to the problem, including the kinetic and potential energy expressions, and expresses uncertainty regarding the inclusion of the electrostatic potential.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the formulation of the Hamiltonian, with some suggesting the use of the generic Hamiltonian involving the vector potential. There are discussions about the implications of the magnetic field's orientation and the appropriate eigenstates for the system.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on the Hamiltonian formulation and suggest considerations for the orientation of the magnetic field. There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's approach, with hints at how to proceed further without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates that this problem was part of a midterm exam, which may impose constraints on the methods or information they can utilize. There is also a mention of the need to consider the charge of the top, which has not been fully addressed in their initial attempt.

MelissaM
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hello,

This was part of my midterm exam that i couldn't solve.
Any help is extremely appreciated.

Problem: The K.E. of a rotating top is given as L^2/2I where L is its angular momentum and I is its moment of inertia. Consider a charged top placed at a constant magnetic field. Assume that the magnetic momentum of the top is proportional to L, M=KL (K is a cst that can be derived from the classical distribution of the charge that is known). Write the Hamiltonian for the quantum top and find the energy eigenstates and energy eigenvalues of the quantum top.This is what i wrote during the exam:

T= L^2/2I and V= -M.B (where B is the magnetic field)
so H=L^2/2I -M.B = L^2/2I - KL.B

then i said since it's a rotating top let's suppose that B is along the z-axis which limits our L to L_z
then, H= L_z( L_z/2I - K.B_z)

and i stopped there.

Now looking calmly at the problem, i realized that i absolutely looked over the fact that it is charged. I think i need to be using A ( the electrostatic potential) along with B but still i have no idea how to start...



Please any help would be awesome!

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maybe i should use : H= 1/2m (p-q.A)^2 + qφ but since V=0 ⇒ H= 1/2m × (p - q.A)^2
 
MelissaM said:
maybe i should use : H= 1/2m (p-q.A)^2 + qφ but since V=0 ⇒ H= 1/2m × (p - q.A)^2

Hi melissa, I think you were on the right track? Because
MelissaM said:
maybe i should use : H= 1/2m (p-q.A)^2 + qφ but since V=0 ⇒ H= 1/2m × (p - q.A)^2

Hi melissa, if you start from your generic hamiltonian:

$$\hat{H} = \frac{(p-q A)^2}{ 2 m}$$

you'll just arrive at the generic Hamiltonian below:

$$\hat{H} \approx {p^2 \over 2m} + K B \cdot L + ... = {L^2 \over 2 I} + K B \cdot L$$

See http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bds10/aqp/lec5_compressed.pdf

This is your original hamiltonian which is correct.

Suppose B is oriented a particular direction: Then rotate your basis so that B is in the z direction ( Because the kinetic term has no preferred direction it can be diagonalized in any direction of space). Then your eigenstates are now
$$|l_z \rangle$$

with energy following properties:

$$ L^2 | l_z \rangle = \hbar^2 l_z (l_z + 1) | l_z \rangle$$

I think you know how the rest looks like from here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MelissaM
paralleltransport said:
Hi melissa, I think you were on the right track? BecauseHi melissa, if you start from your generic hamiltonian:

$$\hat{H} = \frac{(p-q A)^2}{ 2 m}$$

you'll just arrive at the generic Hamiltonian below:

$$\hat{H} \approx {p^2 \over 2m} + K B \cdot L + ... = {L^2 \over 2 I} + K B \cdot L$$

See http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bds10/aqp/lec5_compressed.pdf

This is your original hamiltonian which is correct.

Suppose B is oriented a particular direction: Then rotate your basis so that B is in the z direction ( Because the kinetic term has no preferred direction it can be diagonalized in any direction of space). Then your eigenstates are now
$$|l_z \rangle$$

with energy following properties:

$$ L^2 | l_z \rangle = \hbar^2 l_z (l_z + 1) | l_z \rangle$$

I think you know how the rest looks like from here.
Yes absolutely.
Thank you for the help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K