Quantum mechanics modern textbook

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying the best modern text on quantum mechanics comparable to Cohen's work. Participants express strong opinions about various texts, with Gasiorowicz being dismissed as the worst option. Shankar's text receives positive mentions, although its comparison to Cohen's is uncertain. Recommendations include a book linked from Amazon, noted for its quality, and Griffith's book, which is described as neat. Additionally, Ballentine's text is suggested as a more formal option suitable for graduate-level study. Overall, the conversation highlights a search for comprehensive and well-regarded quantum mechanics resources.
scottbekerham
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
What is the best and most comprehensive modern text on quantum mechanics in the same style as cohen text .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can tell you it's not Gasiorowicz.
 
no this is the worst text i ever seen
 
I have always like Shankar's text although I don't know how this compares with Cohen's.
 
scottbekerham said:
no this is the worst text i ever seen

Which one is?
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Back
Top