Quantum Mechanics Scattering problem, 2 particles elastic collision

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the scattering problem of two spinless particles in an elastic collision, specifically addressing the total scattering cross section and its dependence on angular momentum states. The total cross section is expressed as σtot = (4π/k2)∑ℓ=0(2ℓ+1)sin2δ(k). The resonance condition indicates that the differential cross section diverges at all angles except 90°, with a phase shift of 90° at resonance. The solution requires careful consideration of angular momentum states and their contributions to the cross section.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly scattering theory.
  • Familiarity with partial wave analysis in quantum scattering.
  • Knowledge of angular momentum states and their representation in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic grasp of resonance phenomena in particle collisions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the total scattering cross section in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the significance of phase shifts in scattering processes.
  • Explore the concept of resonance in quantum scattering and its mathematical implications.
  • Investigate angular momentum coupling and its role in particle collisions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on scattering theory, particle physics, and elastic collision analysis.

PineApple2
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Hi. First of all, this question seems a bit obscure to me (like there are data missing) However, I quote it as it appeared in the source, so probably there aren't. Second, it is a question from a previous exam, so it is not graded or anything, and there is no problem helping me solving it...:smile:
After this preliminary, here is the question:

Homework Statement


Two spinless particles are colliding elastically.
(a) Write a formal expression for the total scattering cross section as a sum of partial waves.

(b) We are given that the cross section has resonance at all angles except for when the particles collide at 90o. Far from resonance, the differential cross section is isotropic. If we write the scattering problem as a sum of partial waves, what angular momentum states correspond to the given conditions?

(c) Assume scattering with low energy such that the only contribution to the cross section comes from the two lowest channels. Rewrite the solution to section (a) given the condition you derived at section (b).

(d) What is the corresponding phase shift for a resonance?

(e) Given that when the two particles collide at 90o in resonance, the phase shift is 45o. The momentum at resonance is k_R. Use the results of sections (a)-(d) to calculate the total cross section in resonance.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Ok. My attempt goes like this.

(a) The known expression for the cross section in terms of partial waves is:
<br /> \sigma_{tot} = \frac{4\pi}{k^2}\sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty}(2\ell+1)sin^2\delta_{\ell}(k)<br />
(no derivation here. I didn't take into account anything related to 2 particles...)

(b) In order to meet the given condition that \frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} diverges for every angle except for 90o. This must be the case with f_{\ell} as well (since \frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}=|f_{\ell}|^2). So we need to assemble such a state that would make f_{\ell} diverge for all angles except 90o. From here I am not sure how to continue...

(c) depends on section (b)

(d) The phase shift is 90o as is always the case with a resonance. Am I wrong?

(e) If one particle is scattered at an angle \theta, the other one is scattered at \frac{\pi}{2}-\theta. So according to
\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}=|f(\theta)+f(\pi/2-\theta)|^2 (which is true for identical particles, a fact that we are not given) we need an angular momentum state that vanishes for each pair of angles \theta and \frac{\pi}{2}-\theta. Such a state could maybe consist of Y_2^0 (in which \cos^2(\pi/2-\theta)=\sin^2(\theta) and so it cancels the angular dependence. Then adding up an appropriate factor of Y_0^0 would cancel out the scattering amplitude.

These are all sort of guesses. I am not sure about this question at all. I will be very happy for remarks on this and/or other suggestions.

Thanks!

<br /> <br />
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No one? Please?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K