Quantum motion of a charged particle in a magnetic field

EightBells
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Find eigenenergies for a charged particle in magnetic field B and in a parabolic central potential, ##U(r) = \frac {kr^2} 2##. The particle has mass m and charge q.
Relevant Equations
Hamiltonian for charged particle in magnetic field ##H = \frac 1 {2m} \left( p- \frac {qA} {c^2} \right)^2 +q \phi##
Once I know the Hamiltonian, I know to take the determinant ##\left| \vec H-\lambda \vec I \right| = 0 ## and solve for ##\lambda## which are the eigenvalues/eigenenergies.

My problem is, I'm unsure how to formulate the Hamiltonian. Is my potential ##U(r)## my scalar field ##\phi##? I've seen equations relating B and E fields to the scalar and vector fields, ##\vec B = \nabla {} \times \vec A## and ##\vec E = -\nabla \phi - \frac 1 c \frac {d \vec A} {dt}##, but I'm not sure how to incorporate them or if I even need to.

Do I need an equation for the vector potential ##\vec A##? What is the momentum ##p## in this case?

Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
First, ##U(r)## replaces the ##q\phi##.

Now, my issue with your problem is that you are not giving us the actual magnetic field (or the vector potential). Without that the problem is ill stated and nothing can be done about it. It is an static, uniform Magnetic field?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
andresB said:
First, ##U(r)## replaces the ##q\phi##.

Now, my issue with your problem is that you are not giving us the actual magnetic field (or the vector potential). Without that the problem is ill stated and nothing can be done about it. It is an static, uniform Magnetic field?

That's all the information provided, however the professor has since posted additional notes:

##\vec A = \left( \frac {By} 2 ; \frac {-Bx} 2 ; 0 \right)##
##H = H_{2d} + H_z##, the writing isn't entirely clear so I'm unsure if the "2d" subscript is correct, however ##H_z = \frac {p_z^2} {2m} + \frac {kz^2} {2}## and ##H_{2d} = \frac {\hbar^2} {2m} \left[ \left( -i \frac {\partial} {\partial x} - \frac q {c\hbar} \frac {By} 2 \right)^2 + \left( -i \frac {\partial} {\partial y}+ \frac q {c\hbar} \frac {Bx} 2 \right)^2 \right] + \frac {k(x^2+y^2)} 2##.

From there I find ##H = \frac {\hbar^2} {2m} \left[ \left( -i \frac {\partial} {\partial x} - \frac q {c\hbar} \frac {By} 2 \right)^2 + \left( -i \frac {\partial} {\partial y}+ \frac q {c\hbar} \frac {Bx} 2 \right)^2 + \left( -i \frac {\partial} {\partial z} \right)^2 \right] + \frac {k(x^2+y^2+z^2)} 2##

The professor however finds some expression ## - \frac {\hbar^2} {2m} \frac {\partial^2} {\partial r^2} + \left[ \frac {\hbar^2} 2 \left( \frac {B^2} {4mc^2} + 1 \right) \left(x^2+y^2 \right) \right] + \frac {\hbar^2} {2m} \frac {qB} {c \hbar} \vec l_z## where ##\vec l_z = x \frac {\partial} {\partial y} - y \frac {\partial} {\partial x}## is the angular momentum along the z-axis. We then look for wave functions ##\Psi = e^{i {\varphi} {l_z}} \varphi(r)## and ##l_z = 0, \pm 1, \pm 2## and ##\phi(r)## is the radial component.

I'm used to finding eigenenergies in matrix form using ##|\vec H - E \vec I| = 0##, however given a wave function could I still use ##H |\Psi \rangle = E |\Psi \rangle## and work through the partial derivatives of ##H \Psi## to solve for the eigenenergies E? How do I find the appropriate wave function to use then?
 
andresB said:
First, ##U(r)## replaces the ##q\phi##.

Now, my issue with your problem is that you are not giving us the actual magnetic field (or the vector potential). Without that the problem is ill stated and nothing can be done about it. It is an static, uniform Magnetic field?
\vec{A} = \approx\frac{\vec{B}\times\vec{r}}{2}
I can never remember what the sign is...
 
  • Like
Likes EightBells

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K