Quantum particle reflection from a potential drop

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 6K views
SonOfOle
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A quantum mechanical particle with mass [tex]m[/tex] and energy [tex]E[/tex] approaches a potential drop from the [tex]-x[/tex] region, where the potential is described by:
[tex]V(x)=\left\{\stackrel{0 textrm{if} x\leq 0}{-V_0 textrm{if} x> 0}[/tex].

What is the probability it will be reflected by the potential?


Homework Equations


Incident Wave: [tex]\Psi (x,t) = A e^{k x - \omega t} \textrm{where} k= \sqrt{2 m D} /2[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



I want to say 0, but that's without doing the math on it. The continuity equations yield 3 unknowns (A, B, C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ignore above post. I posted too soon. Here's my real question.

Homework Statement


A quantum mechanical particle with mass [tex]m[/tex] and energy [tex]E[/tex] approaches a potential drop from the [tex]-x[/tex] region, where the potential is described by:
[tex]V(x)=\left\{\stackrel{0 \textrm{if} x\leq 0}{-V_0 \textrm{if} x> 0}[/tex].

What is the probability it will be reflected by the potential?


Homework Equations


Incident Wave: [tex]\Psi (x,t) = A e^{k x - \omega t} \textrm{where} k= \sqrt{2 m E} / \hbar[/tex]

Reflected Wave: [tex]\Psi (x,t) = B e^{-k x - \omega t} \textrm{where} k= \sqrt{2 m E} / \hbar[/tex]

Transmitted Wave: [tex]\Psi (x,t) = C e^{k x - \alpha t} \textrm{where} \alpha = \sqrt{2 m (E+V_0)} / \hbar[/tex]

Continuity Equations: [tex]\Psi_A + \Psi_B = \Psi_C[/tex] and [tex]\partial_x \Psi_A + \partial_x \Psi_B = \partial_x \Psi_C[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



Plug in [tex]\Psi_A[/tex], [tex]\Psi_B[/tex], and [tex]\Psi_C[/tex] into the continuity equations and get these two equations:

[tex]A + B = C[/tex]
[tex]i A k - i B k = i C \alpha[/tex]

Plug the first into the second, and get
[tex]\frac{B}{A} = \frac{k -\alpha}{k + \alpha}[/tex]

which is the probability of reflection.

Now, the math makes sense, but it doesn't make sense overall because if [tex]\alpha[/tex] is greater than [tex]k[/tex] then the probability is negative. Also, reflecting from a drop in potential doesn't make sense intuitively... but that may just be QM.

Any ideas?
 
Hmm... Okay. Even still, wouldn't large [tex]V_0[/tex] lead to large [tex]\alpha[/tex], and thus for large [tex]V_0[/tex], |B|/|A| --> 1?