Hi everybody,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In Robert W. Boyd's book "Nonlinear Optics", the quantum treatment of the nonlinear optical susceptibility lead to the next expression, for the second order case:

[itex]\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}(\omega_{\sigma},\omega_q,\omega_p)=\frac{N}{\hbar^2} P_F\sum_{mn} \frac{\mu_{gn}^i\mu_{nm}^j\mu_{mg}^k}{(\omega_{ng}-\omega_{\sigma})(\omega_{mg}-\omega_p)}[/itex]

- At first time, I supposed [itex] \mu_{nm}=\langle{\phi_n} |\hat{\mu} |{\phi_m}\rangle[/itex] where [itex]\phi_n[/itex] and [itex]\phi_m[/itex] are eigenstates of nonperturbated system. But when I saw the illustration (the same that I show you here), the levels [itex]n[/itex] and [itex]m[/itex] are virtuals !

My question is: in concrete case, how to define and calculate the matrix element [itex] \mu_{nm}[/itex] ?

Thank you everybody.

* forgive me for my English.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Quantum treatment of nonlinear susceptibility

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**