Quantum Tunelling Problem with Boundary Conditions

fissile_uranium
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
a) Assume a particle is sent from x = +∞ towards x = 0 with amplitude A and it is reflected to a
right moving wave with amplitude B. Find a relation between A and B in terms of E, V0, and a (and possibly some fundemental constants.)

b) Calculate the norm |B/A| and explain what your result implies? Is it physically sensible? (Hint:
for a complex number (u + iv)/(a + ib) with real numbers u, v, a, b, find the norm.)

c) Let −e^i2δ be the phase of the ratio B/A and find an expression for the so-called phase shift δ.
Relevant Equations
Shrödinger's Equation
Questions and the figure is given. This is a task from previous years, fortunately there are no answers.

I have tried to solve, starting from part a, but I think I do not understand how to set boundary conditions. I ended up with:

2*C*e^(i*a*k2)=B*e^-i*a*k1*(1-(i*k1/i*k2)

When I proceed with part b, I get (k2-k1)^2/(2*k2)^2

And this does not seem coincide wih the Hint.

From beginning.
I set my equations as:
For Region 2 (0-pot):

Ae^ik1x + Be^-ik1x

and For Region 3:
Ce^ik2x + De^-ik2x

Later on I eliminated wave part with coefficient A since it blows up as x goes to inf. And using ψ(x) and ψ'(x) I eliminated the part with coeff D. So I ended up with a relation between B and C term, two unknowns (which is meaningful). But I think I interpreted the reflection wrong. Should it be a relation between A and B terms?

I also thougt, since the wall has inf. pot. can I take it as a full reflection and amplitude 1=B=C? and move on with finding A and B? It also seems like there would be a on-going reflection loop in the well, is it important?

I appreciate any help and insightful comment! I am new with modern physics, every recommendation is appreciated.

Thanks!

1744114308588.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fissile_uranium said:
From beginning.
I set my equations as:
For Region 2 (0-pot):

Ae^ik1x + Be^-ik1x

and For Region 3:
Ce^ik2x + De^-ik2x

Later on I eliminated wave part with coefficient A since it blows up as x goes to inf.

Labeling the two regions as "Region 2" and "Region 3" and using ##k_1## for Region 2 and ##k_2## for Region 3 could be confusing.

How are ##k_1## and ##k_2## related to ##E## and ##V_0##?

It looks like you used the coefficient ##A## for a part of the wavefunction in Region 2: ##0 \leq x \leq a##. But the statement of the problem denotes ##A## as the coefficient for the part of the wavefunction coming in from infinity. So, the part of the wavefunction with coefficient ##A## should be for the region ##a \leq x < \infty##, (Region 3).

You said you eliminated ##Ae^{ik_1 x}## since this part blows up as ##x## goes to ##\infty##.
If ##k## is a real number, ##e^{ikx}## does not blow up for ##x \rightarrow \infty##. ##e^{ikx}## always has magnitude equal to ##1## for real ##k##.

For a particle with wavenumber ##k## moving to the left, would you use ##e^{ik x}## or ##e^{-ik x}##? (Assume ##k## is a positive real number.)

EDIT: Since ##E > V_0##, there is no "tunneling" in this problem.
 
Last edited:
You are correct, I must have said Scattering Problem.

I have written ##k_2= \sqrt{(2m*E/ \hbar^2)}## and ##k_1= \sqrt{(2m*(E-u_0)/ \hbar^2)}##

You are also correct about that part not blowing up but I should not solely take exponential parts as 1 right? Now I end up with 4 unknowns, only being able to eliminate one wave equation from derivative. How can I find a relation between two items?. Also I am taking ##e^{(-ikx)}## as left moving wave.

Can you help me about boundary conditions? Also, sorry for late responding, thanks.
 
fissile_uranium said:
You are correct, I must have said Scattering Problem.

I have written ##k_2= \sqrt{(2m*E/ \hbar^2)}## and ##k_1= \sqrt{(2m*(E-u_0)/ \hbar^2)}##
OK. Here ##u_0 = V_0##.
Edit: Looks like you have the subscripts "1" and "2" switched. Do you agree?

fissile_uranium said:
You are also correct about that part not blowing up but I should not solely take exponential parts as 1 right?
I'm not sure what "1" refers to here. In the region ##0 < x < a## you can use a superposition of exponentials ##\psi_1(x) = C e^{ik_1 x} + D e^{-ik_1 x}## or, equivalently, you can use ##\psi_1(x) = C \sin(k_1 x) + D \cos(k_1 x)##. If you think about the boundary condition at ##x = 0##, you should be able to see which of these choices is better for this problem.

fissile_uranium said:
Now I end up with 4 unknowns,
Yes. For the region ##x > a## we have ##\psi_2(x) = C_1 e^{ik_2 x} + C_2 e^{-ik_2 x}##. Here, I've used the notation ##C_1## and ##C_2## for the constants. But, one of these constants is ##A## and the other is ##B##, where ##A## and ##B## are as given in the problem statement. Which of ##C_1## and ##C_2## is equal to ##A## and which is ##B##?

Can you state the boundary conditions that must be satisfied at ##x = 0## and ##x = a##?
 
Last edited:
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
It's given a gas of particles all identical which has T fixed and spin S. Let's ##g(\epsilon)## the density of orbital states and ##g(\epsilon) = g_0## for ##\forall \epsilon \in [\epsilon_0, \epsilon_1]##, zero otherwise. How to compute the number of accessible quantum states of one particle? This is my attempt, and I suspect that is not good. Let S=0 and then bosons in a system. Simply, if we have the density of orbitals we have to integrate ##g(\epsilon)## and we have...
Back
Top