Quantum Tunneling for particles of equal energies but different masses

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the qualitative explanation of why a particle with a smaller mass has a greater probability of tunneling through a potential barrier compared to a particle with a larger mass, given that both have the same total energy. The scope includes conceptual reasoning and exploratory insights into quantum tunneling phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a smaller mass particle has a greater probability of tunneling due to its wavefunction being larger, allowing it to exist in more locations in spacetime.
  • Another participant compares the situation to the ease of driving a small nail into a wall versus a larger one, implying that smaller mass particles can penetrate barriers more easily.
  • A different participant proposes that the uncertainty in position might be greater for smaller mass particles, leading to a higher tunneling probability, although they express confusion about the relationship between mass and uncertainty.
  • One participant introduces the concept of Zitterbewegung, suggesting that the frequency of this phenomenon could relate to the offset in position for smaller particles.
  • Another participant notes that because both particles have the same energy, the smaller particle must be moving at a higher velocity, which they argue contributes to a greater uncertainty in position and thus a higher tunneling probability.
  • A later reply challenges this by mentioning the Compton wavelength, stating it is inversely proportional to rest mass and does not depend on the particle's momentum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reasons behind the tunneling probability related to mass and uncertainty, indicating that multiple competing explanations are present and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on assumptions about the relationship between mass, velocity, and uncertainty, which are not fully explored or defined in the discussion. The implications of Zitterbewegung and its relevance to tunneling are also not clearly established.

atay5510
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Howdy,

Can anyone explain qualitatively (without using any maths) why a particle with a smaller mass has a greater probability of tunneling through a potential barrier than another particle with a larger mass but of the same total energy?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
same reason it's easier to put a small nail in a wall rather than a big one...

if that doesn't make sense, look up scattering pehnomena...
 
Last edited:
ummm sorry still a bit confused.

I thought maybe is had something to do with the uncertainty in positon of each particle? I read somewhere that the smaller the mass of the particle, the larger the uncertainty in position and thus a higher probability that tunneling will be successful? Not sure why a smaller mass would have a large uncertainty in position but I am still stumped
 
>>equal energies
>>different masses

consider, a larger (higher mass) particle with the same energy as a smaller particle. The Smaller particle has a great deal more uncertainty at this level, as it's wavefunction is much, much larger than the Larger particle's. Therefore, if it exists at many more places in spacetime (theoretically speaking, of course) than the other paticle, the probability for Tunnelling to occur is that much greater.

>>small nail and big nail

Couldn't put it better myself XD
 
It might be related to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zitterbewegung" . The bigger frequency of Zitterbewegung the smaller offset in position.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
so because the two particles have the same energies, it is obvious that the smaller particle must be moving at a higher velocity than the larger particle and thus have a greater uncertainty in position than the larger particle and therefore a greater probability of tunneling?
 
No, Compton wavelength that is related to this is inversely proportional to rest mass. It does not depend from momentum of particle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K