Quantum Zeno Effect: What is the argument?

  • Thread starter James MC
  • Start date
  • #1
174
0
Every general explanation of the quantum zeno effect I've found is (from my perspective) so full of gaps that I cannot understand the explanation. I am wondering if anyone can help me fill in the gaps here?

The most detailed explanation I've found runs something like this:

Let |ψ0> be the initial quantum state of a system at time 0 and let |ψt> be its state at some later time t.

The dynamical evolution of the system is described by a unitary operator U(t) that is a complex function of the initial system's Hamiltonian: U(t) = e-iHt. Thus: |ψt> = U(t)|ψ0>.

The "survival" probability Ps that the system will still be in the initial state at t is given by:

Ps = |<ψ0t>|2 = |<ψ0|e-iHt0>|2

So far so good. But now standard explanations assert that:

Ps = |<ψ0|e-iHt0>|2 = 1 - (ΔH)2t2
(Where (ΔH)2 = <ψ0|H20> - (<ψ0|H|ψ0>)2)

Where does that come from? Is it meant to be obvious that 1 - (ΔH)2t2 follows from the left hand side?

At any rate, we can now define the Zeno time Z = 1/ΔH so that:

Ps = 1 - [itex]\frac{t^{2}}{Z^{2}}[/itex]

Presumably this shows that as t gets smaller the probability tends to 1 so that the faster we measure the system after time = 0 the more probable it will be found in its initial state.

Now for the final bit. If we consider N measurements then we can understand the survival probability given those N measurements as:

P[itex]^{N}_{s}[/itex] = (1 - [itex]\frac{t^{2}}{N^{2}Z^{2}}[/itex])N

...so that in the limit of continuous measurements where N → ∞ we get:

[itex]\stackrel{Lim}{N→∞}[/itex] P[itex]^{N}_{s}[/itex] = 1

I just don't see how this final bit follows. After all, if t is large then increasing N won't bring on the QZE. Surely we also need t → 0 but I don't see how the above accounts for this.

Any help would be most appreciated, thanks.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
11,224
3,887
A few more details can be found, e.g., in
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/1311.4363
Read everything from Eq. (2) to Eq. (9).
In particular, in calculating the final limit, t is neither very large nor close to 0.
I hope it helps.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #3
strangerep
Science Advisor
3,204
1,056
Every general explanation of the quantum zeno effect I've found is (from my perspective) so full of gaps that I cannot understand the explanation. I am wondering if anyone can help me fill in the gaps here?
If you wish to understand such things properly, you should also study (carefully!) Ballentine section 12.2 pp338-343.

I'm happy to (try and) fill in any details more explicitly, but only after you've read Ballentine -- so that I don't have to repeat textbook stuff here. :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #4
wle
316
139
So far so good. But now standard explanations assert that:

Ps = |<ψ0|e-iHt0>|2 = 1 - (ΔH)2t2
(Where (ΔH)2 = <ψ0|H20> - (<ψ0|H|ψ0>)2)

Where does that come from? Is it meant to be obvious that 1 - (ΔH)2t2 follows from the left hand side?
It's an approximation valid for small [itex]t[/itex] (obviously, because the expression becomes negative for [itex]t > \Delta H[/itex]). You can obtain it by expanding the exponential as

[tex]e^{-iHt} = \mathbb{1} - i H t - \tfrac{1}{2} H^{2} t^{2} + \dotsb[/tex]
and only keeping the terms up to order [itex]t^{2}[/itex] in the expression you get for the survival probability.


Now for the final bit. If we consider N measurements then we can understand the survival probability given those N measurements as:

P[itex]^{N}_{s}[/itex] = (1 - [itex]\frac{t^{2}}{N^{2}Z^{2}}[/itex])N

...so that in the limit of continuous measurements where N → ∞ we get:

[itex]\stackrel{Lim}{N→∞}[/itex] P[itex]^{N}_{s}[/itex] = 1

I just don't see how this final bit follows. After all, if t is large then increasing N won't bring on the QZE. Surely we also need t → 0 but I don't see how the above accounts for this.
You do measure after time intervals that become arbitrarily small. Instead of doing a single measurement after a time [itex]t[/itex], you perform [itex]N[/itex] successive measurements at time intervals [itex]\delta t = \frac{t}{N}[/itex]. That's why the [itex]\frac{t^{2}}{Z^{2}}[/itex] changes to [itex]\frac{t^{2}}{N^{2} Z^{2}}[/itex] in the expression for the survival probability.

As for the limit itself, there's more than one approach that might work. One way is to factor [itex]1 - \frac{t^{2}}{N^{2} Z^{2}}[/itex] as [itex]\bigl( 1 + \frac{t}{N Z} \bigr) \bigl( 1 - \frac{t}{N Z} \bigr)[/itex] and use that [itex]\lim_{n \to \infty} \bigl( 1 + \frac{x}{n} \bigr)^{n} = e^{x}[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #5
I also tryed to understand this calculation and still dont get it. Can someone please help me with the next step after the expanding of the exponential?
 

Related Threads on Quantum Zeno Effect: What is the argument?

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Top