Quark flavor and color independent?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the independence of quark flavor and color charges, exploring the properties of quarks and anti-quarks, their representations in quantum chromodynamics, and the interactions mediated by gluons. Participants examine the implications of these properties and seek clarification on specific aspects of quark behavior and representation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that quark flavor and color charges are independent of each other.
  • One participant questions whether an up quark can possess anti-colors, leading to a correction that quarks only carry color charges (red, green, blue) and not anti-colors.
  • Another participant suggests that only gluons can have combinations of color and anti-color, prompting further exploration of quark and anti-quark properties.
  • A participant references a diagram from Wikipedia, seeking clarification on the interactions depicted between quarks and anti-quarks via gluons.
  • Some participants challenge the interpretation of gluon interactions, emphasizing the need for understanding group representation theory to grasp the underlying concepts.
  • There is a discussion about the representation of quarks and anti-quarks in Feynman diagrams and the potential oversimplification in visual representations of particle interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of quark color charges and their interactions, with no consensus reached on the interpretation of diagrams or the implications of quark and gluon behavior.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in understanding group representation theory and the complexities of Feynman diagrams, which may affect their interpretations of quark interactions.

friend
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
9
Each quark as a flavor charge and a color charge. Are these two properties totally independent of each other? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mfb said:
Yes.
So, for example an up quark, u, can have any of the following colors: red, green, blue, anti-red, anti-green, and anti-blue? And an anti-up quark, u, can have any of those colors or anti-colors, too. Is this right? Thanks.

PS. how do I do an overstrike in this forum?
 
friend said:
So, for example an up quark, u, can have any of the following colors: red, green, blue, anti-red, anti-green, and anti-blue?
No, a quark cannot carry anti-colour. It is in the ##\bf 3## representation of SU(3), not in the ##\bf \bar 3## representation.
 
Orodruin said:
No, a quark cannot carry anti-colour. It is in the ##\bf 3## representation of SU(3), not in the ##\bf \bar 3## representation.
OK. So now I'm learning something (I think). Correct me if I'm wrong. Quarks of any flavor or anti-flavor, e.g., ##u## or ##\bar u##, can only have red, greed, or blue color. But only the gluons can have anti-color in combination with a color. Is this right? Thanks ever so much.
 
friend said:
OK. So now I'm learning something (I think). Correct me if I'm wrong. Quarks of any flavor or anti-flavor, e.g., ##u## or ##\bar u##, can only have red, greed, or blue color. But only the gluons can have anti-color in combination with a color. Is this right? Thanks ever so much.
I think there needs to be a correction. I found this site and similar that says quarks have a color charge (red, green, blue), but anti-quarks have anti-color (anti-red, anti-green, anti-blue). The link given is to a site claiming to be sponsored by DOE and NSF. If this is not credible, can someone point me to a more reliable source that confirms this? Thanks.
 
Yes, anti-quarks transform according to ##\bf\bar 3##. Gluons transform according to the adjoint representation ##\bf 8## and gluons are therefore traceless colour-anticolour combinations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
On the Wikipedia site for quarks, I found this diagram. There is no reference to individual quarks. But it does seem to suggest that a gluon travels only from one type of quark to its anti-quark version. For example, in the diagram, the ##g####g\bar b## gluon is between the ##q####g## quark and the ##\bar q####b## anti-quark. Does this mean that the ##g####g\bar b## gluon must travel between any quark of color green and any anti-quark of color blue? (I thought anti-quarks can only have anti-color.) Or does this mean that the ##g####g\bar b## gluon can only travel between a ##u## quark and a ##\bar u## anti-quark, or can only travel between a ##d## quark and a ##\bar d## anti-quark, or can only travel between a ##s## quark and a ##\bar s## anti-quark, etc? I'd appreciate any help in reading this diagram. Thanks.
600px-Strong_force_charges.svg.png
 

Attachments

  • 600px-Strong_force_charges.svg.png
    600px-Strong_force_charges.svg.png
    4.2 KB · Views: 650
friend said:
But it does seem to suggest that a gluon travels only from one type of quark to its anti-quark version.
No, and I don't know how you got that idea. Check Feynman diagrams of gluon exchange.
friend said:
Does this mean that the ##g####g\bar b## gluon must travel between any quark of color green and any anti-quark of color blue?
No.
friend said:
(I thought anti-quarks can only have anti-color.)
Correct.
 
  • #10
That diagram is group-theoretical in origin and shows the charges under the diagonal SU(3) generators. It has nothing to do with gluons "travelling" between quarks. In order to understand the diagram you need to understand group representation theory, which it is not clear to me from this thread if you do or not.

Also note that when you encounter Feynman diagrams they are really not pictures of particles flying around (although physicists will often talk about them in a manner that might suggest that to a layman), they are graphical representations of mathematical terms in a series expansion. There is also some caveats for representing colour in Feynman diagrams ...
 
  • #11
I don't see the problem. Use whatever language you're would like. I'm sure things can get complicated with superpositions and different basis. But the language used in the figure means something. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems obvious that ##\bar q## is an anti-quark whereas ##q## is a quark. The down pointing blue triangle must mean anti-blue, since anti-quarks on take only anti-colors. And the ##g\bar b## in the symbol ##g####g\bar b## seems to indicate what color is being changed by that gluon. If someone could explain what pair of quarks can possibly be changed by ##g####g\bar b## and how they are changed, this would be very helpful.
 
  • #12
This video seems to be in the same spirit as the diagram above. The author is Dr. Vitaly Velizhanin. I'm sure it's probably an oversimplification. But is it actually wrong? Does it neglect other possible interactions with any of the gluons it depicts? For it seems to depict a gluon of a certain color/anti-color coming from only one type of quark and being accepted by only one other type of quark. Thanks.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
6K