Quartic with complex coefficients

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a fourth-order polynomial with complex coefficients, specifically in the form x^4 + Ax^3 + (B_1 + B_2p)x^2 - (C + Ap)x + D + Ep = 0. The original poster has used Ferrari's method for real coefficients but is uncertain about its application with complex parameters. They seek guidance on classifying the roots based on the parameters, particularly whether the presence of a non-zero imaginary part in p leads to all complex solutions. The consensus is that Ferrari's method is applicable to both real and complex coefficients. The poster expresses a desire to understand the conditions under which the polynomial yields real versus complex roots.
ab959
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am trying to solve a fourth order polynomial which is in the following form

x^4+Ax^3+(B_1+B_2p)x^2-(C+Ap)x+D+Ep=0

Where A, B_1, B_2, C, D, E, are real parameters and p is a complex parameter.

I have investigated many ways of solving this equation however there does not seem to be much information regarding complex coefficients. My solution is very messy for real coefficients but it still exists and I derived it using Ferrari's method. I am not sure if I can use this method in the case where p is complex.

Any suggestions will be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, Ferrari's method works for both real and comples coefficients.
 
OK great thanks I realized this soon after I posted. What I am more interested in knowing is if you classify the roots in terms of the parameters. I.e. knowing when there will be 4 real roots or complex roots etc. My intuition tells me however that if Im(p) not equal to zero then all solutions will be complex. This is possible for real coefficients however I don't know if this can be done for complex coefficients.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K