Queen's engineering physics graduates' job prospects

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the job prospects and academic reputation of the Engineering Physics program at Queen's University, particularly from the perspective of a prospective student. Participants explore the nature of the program, its difficulty, and its recognition compared to other institutions, as well as the implications for employment after graduation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about job prospects after graduating from Engineering Physics at Queen's, questioning the program's reputation and ranking.
  • Another participant asserts that Queen's has a strong program and believes job acquisition will depend on factors beyond the program itself.
  • It is noted that Engineering Physics differs significantly from Mechanical Engineering, being more rigorous and often leading students towards graduate studies.
  • Concerns are raised about the workload in the Engineering Physics program, with some participants mentioning that many students switch to easier programs due to the demands of the curriculum.
  • Professional engineering certification in Canada is highlighted as a critical factor for job advancement, particularly in government roles.
  • Some participants discuss the variability in university rankings and how they may not reflect personal priorities or the quality of education received.
  • There is mention of the prestige of specific research groups within the Physics department at Queen's, suggesting that the program has strong academic components, particularly in particle physics.
  • A participant compares the Engineering Physics program at Queen's with the Physical Sciences program at the University of Toronto, seeking insights on which may be more suitable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions regarding the job prospects and academic rigor of the Engineering Physics program. While some believe it is a prestigious and rigorous program that can lead to good job opportunities, others highlight the challenges and high dropout rates associated with it. There is no consensus on the program's ranking or its implications for future employment.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of professional engineering certification in Canada, which may affect job prospects. There are also references to varying perceptions of university rankings between North America and China, indicating a potential cultural difference in evaluating educational institutions.

Who May Find This Useful

Prospective students considering Engineering Physics at Queen's University or similar programs, as well as those interested in the job market for engineering graduates in Canada.

geminiarcher
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am a Chinese student who has just been admitted to Queen's university(engineering physics).
I plan to be an engineer in the future but I don't know if I could get a job easily after graduating from engineering physics.
What is more, someone told me that the engineering physics in Queen's ranks first of its own kind in Canada and third in North America, is it true? Is engineering physics really that good?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The girl who works beside me is an applied mathematics engineer from queens university. They do have a very good program, and I'm sure you can find a job, and if you cant, it will be for other reasons than what program you graduated from. I also go to Waterloo, which has a very good engineering program as well. I also do not know what engineering physics is. is that a mechanical engineer?
 
Eng Phys is not like Mech Eng, its a lot harder and generally geared towards people going to grad school. Eng phys students take an option (mech, ece, materials, etc) and its basically like doing two undergrad degrees one in engineering and one in physics. If you just want a job out of undergrad you might choose a different option that is easier a lot of people end up switching out of eng phys into a different program after a few months when they realize they can't hack it, that said you don't actually choose your engineering path until second year at Queen's
 
The important thing to keep in mind is that regardless of where you get you degree, it's not going to do the work for you. Obtaining a degree in EngPhys will qualify you to apply for certain jobs, but it won't guarantee you a job. No degree will.

Canadian universities are ranked annually by Maclean's magazine (kind of a Canadian version of Time). I usually take such rankings with a grain of salt though. What a magazine thinks is important is not neccessarily the same as what is important to you.
 
Make sure that the eng physics qualifies you as an 'engineer' -
In Canada professional engineering certification is taken very seriously. In a lot of companies, and especially in government, you must be a professional engineer to rise above a certain level - even in areas where you do no actual engineering.

(assuming you intend to live/work in Canada)
 
I'm currently enrolled in an "Engineering Science" 2yr program. Besides the usual calculus battery + linear algebra + diff eqs the core of the program is heavy on physics (the 3 core physics courses are titled "engineering physics"). However, as you noticed, the degree awarded is an associate's since this program is designed to send you to a 4yr college. So... what exactly is engineering physics? The Wikipedia entry is helpful but not conclusive.
 
Anyways, I am currently TAing the second year eng phys lab at Queen's. Yes it qualifies you as an engineer, as I mentioned above its basically two degrees, a couple of the graduate students in my lab came out of the eng phys program and wear their eng ring with pride. That said, a typical eng phys student takes 7-8 courses a semester as compared to 5 for a physics major or engineer major. It is a lot more work for the eng phys program and is considered the most prestigious at this school. Because of the extra course load a lot of students drop out mid way through first term in their second year to have more of a social life. They switch into mech eng, or ece or some easier program.
At Queen's you are a general engineer first year, its in the second year you choose which path to follow, those who think they are particularly bright out of their first year courses tend to come into eng phys, though its a pretty small program compared to a lot of the engineering tracks, as it is seen as particularly hard.
 
CaptainQuaser said:
Anyways, I am currently TAing the second year eng phys lab at Queen's. Yes it qualifies you as an engineer, as I mentioned above its basically two degrees, a couple of the graduate students in my lab came out of the eng phys program and wear their eng ring with pride. That said, a typical eng phys student takes 7-8 courses a semester as compared to 5 for a physics major or engineer major. It is a lot more work for the eng phys program and is considered the most prestigious at this school. Because of the extra course load a lot of students drop out mid way through first term in their second year to have more of a social life. They switch into mech eng, or ece or some easier program.
At Queen's you are a general engineer first year, its in the second year you choose which path to follow, those who think they are particularly bright out of their first year courses tend to come into eng phys, though its a pretty small program compared to a lot of the engineering tracks, as it is seen as particularly hard.

How about the graduate study and academic prestige of the Physics, Engineering Physics and Astronomy in Queen's U? I am also interested in the physics department of Queen's graduate school. Thanks.
 
From a Chinese Newpaper, it says that Queens Engphy is just behind MIT and Caltech. Though its not very well known in Canada unlike Engsci(which includes a phy option).
 
  • #10
One thing that can throw people off is that in China, there is a very clear ranking of schools based on the cutoff scores for the national entrance examination. In North America, there isn't a clear ranking of schools, and school rank doesn't mean nearly as much because the difference between a "high ranking" school and a "low ranking" school is much, much smaller in the US than in China.
 
  • #11
i2000s said:
How about the graduate study and academic prestige of the Physics, Engineering Physics and Astronomy in Queen's U? I am also interested in the physics department of Queen's graduate school. Thanks.

Prestige I don't really pay to much attention to, it also depends on you're field.
The particle physics group here (SNO lab, etc) is very strong, and I hear the PI of that project (Art McDonald) is on the Nobel watch list for the contributions to discovering neutrino decay or something like that.

The condensed matter group is fairly young, a lot of the profs are in their tenure year this year. That said the research is very promising, and good students here out of a masters can go about anywhere, (someone out of my lab just got full funding at Cambridge, others go to MIT, Berkley, etc)

Its really just about finding a supervisor and research group that will enable you to succeed.
 
  • #12
I'm interested in that program as well, but I can't really find much info on it other than Queen's own site. I would like to know if it's the right program for me, I got accepted to U of T physical sciences and I am considering to specialize in physics, but I am also really interested in Queen's EngPhy. Is there anyone who knows a lot about the program and how is it compared to U of T's engsci physics option? or to their physics specialist program?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
663
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
4K