I Queries on the operation of the LHC with pilot beams before Run 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wrichik Basu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beams Lhc
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the operation of the LHC with pilot beams in preparation for Run 3, highlighting the role of various beam types such as physics beams, probe beams, and setup beams, which are essential for testing and diagnostics. Participants express curiosity about the filling scheme, which outlines the arrangement of bunches in the ring and the necessary gaps for safe operation. There is also a focus on beam modes, including ramping up and down, and the implications for energy management within the accelerator. Concerns are raised regarding the impact of splashes on collimators, with clarification that while splashes occur at low intensity, they can still cause some damage. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the technical intricacies of LHC operations and the importance of understanding beam dynamics and safety measures.
Wrichik Basu
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,180
Reaction score
2,720
We all are aware of the fact that the LHC is now seeing pilot beams in preparation for Run 3 next year. Recently, I came to know about a Twitter account, @lhcstatus2, which automatically posts updates about the current operation of the LHC. I am interested in learning about some of the different things that it has tweeted till date. For each case, I am writing what I understand; please let me know if I am wrong/partially correct. Also, feel free to add some knowledge too.

1. Injection Physics Beam

What I understand: Physics beam is the one that will result in stable beams. The beams will be ramped in energy, and then will be brought into collisions at the IPs for generating physics data. In the SPS, this beam is generated using Q20 optics.​
2. Injection Probe Beam

What I understand: Not very sure about this. Beams to probe the injection system? No idea. Also, can you throw some light on the filling scheme, and what does it signify?​
3. Injection Setup Beam

What I understand: Beams to check the setup of different beam instrumentation/diagnostics elements around the ring (like collimators, BPMs and BLMs)? And again, what about the filling scheme?​
4. Beam mode: Ramp down

What I understand: Ramping the beam is increasing the energy of the beam. However, I am not sure how they ramp down the beam. Which elements around the ring help in decreasing the energy of the beam? And why is it necessary to decrease the beam energy?​
5. Beam mode: Adjust

What I understand: Adjust what?​
6. What is cogging?

MKI is definitely an injection kicker magnet. But what is cogging?​
7. Beam mode: Cycling
What I understand: No idea.​
8. Beam mode: Flat top
What I understand: After the beam is injected, and its energy is ramped up, probably the beam is in the flat top mode, meaning that it has reached its highest energy. Am I right?​
9. Are splashes good for the health of collimators?
Splashes and collisions are not the same. As per this not-so-technical article from CERN for the layman, splashes are created when the collimator jaws before the ATLAS and CMS IPs are pushed into the beams, so that a spray of particles travel down the experiment, and are captured by the calorimeters. Definitely these beams are not the 3.5 TeV beams, otherwise the collimators would suffer severe damage. But even then, there will be some damage to the collimators because, as far as I know, they are generally designed for intercepting off-momentum particles, particles outside RF buckets, or for halo cleaning; they are not meant to take the complete beam (the beam dump is designed for that purpose). Before Run 3 next year, will the collimator jaws be replaced again?​
Also, is such a spray of particles created even when the beam halo is intercepted during normal LHC operation? If yes, how are those secondary showers prevented from traveling down the beam line?​
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you search for e.g. "LHC beam modes"? The first hit has a list with explanations.
Wrichik Basu said:
Also, can you throw some light on the filling scheme, and what does it signify?
It's a somewhat cryptic description of where in the ring the bunches are. The fill pattern always needs one large gap which is used to dump the beam (a time where no bunches fly past the beam dump kicker magnets while they ramp up). It needs smaller gaps coming from SPS injections (both SPS and LHC kicker magnets need to ramp up/down in these gaps). It needs even smaller gaps from the PS to SPS transition for the same reason. You get up to 72 bunches with 25 ns spacing, then a 300 ns gap (PS to SPS), that repeats a few times until you get a ~1000 ns gap (SPS to LHC), repeat that larger pattern, and finally add a ~3000 ns gap (LHC to beam dump). Here is some more information about fill patterns
Haven't looked into the pattern names for a while, but if I remember correctly:
"single" means one bunch per PS group or even one bunch per LHC injection?
"4b" is 4 bunches in total (per ring)
2_2_2 are 2 colliding bunches in ATLAS/CMS, LHCb, ALICE (or ATLAS/CMS, ALICE, LHCb? Not sure).
Don't know what noLR is.
Wrichik Basu said:
9. Are splashes good for the health of collimators?
They are done with a very low beam intensity.

Collimators do produce secondary particles during regular operation and filtering them out (with additional collimator elements) is a science on its own. Luckily they have a much lower energy so they can't follow the beam for long.
 
  • Informative
Likes Wrichik Basu
Theoretical physicist C.N. Yang died at the age of 103 years on October 18, 2025. He is the Yang in Yang-Mills theory, which he and his collaborators devised in 1953, which is a generic quantum field theory that is used by scientists to study amplitudes (i.e. vector probabilities) that are foundational in all Standard Model processes and most quantum gravity theories. He also won a Nobel prize in 1957 for his work on CP violation. (I didn't see the post in General Discussions at PF on his...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
12K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K