Question about a Problem from Sakurai

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xyius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sakurai
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem from Sakurai's book on Quantum Mechanics, specifically focusing on the interpretation of the propagator and its relation to probability and the partition function in a canonical ensemble context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the meaning of the probability expression provided in the solution, questioning the role of the partition function and the nature of the propagator. Participants discuss the interpretation of beta as an inverse temperature and its implications for probability in statistical mechanics.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the relationship between the propagator and the partition function, while others express confusion about the derivation of the probability expression and the underlying reasoning. The discussion is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a lack of familiarity with statistical mechanics, which may contribute to their questions about the concepts being discussed. There are references to specific parts of the Sakurai text that are not included in the thread, which may limit the clarity of the discussion.

Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4
Hello!

I am studying the Sakurai book on Quantum mechanics and I am doing a problem. I have the solutions to the problems to help me understand the material better but I do not understand this solution.

Homework Statement



SEE "Sakurai Problem 1" in attachments

K is the propagator in wave mechanics.


2. Solution

SEE "Sakurai Problem 1" in attachments

There are a few parts of this solution that I do not understand.

1.) In the first part it states that "The probability is.."

[tex]P(Ea')=exp(-βEa')/Z[/tex]

Probability of what? It doesn't actually tell me what the "Partition function" is or means. Isn't the propagator an operator? I thought in order to have a probability you need to have a state in mind.

2.) I also do not understand why the ground state energy is equal to that summation "U=..." in the next line.

3.) I do not understand the first change of variables in the differential, da' = L/2π dk

If anyone could help me understand this, it would be much appreciated! :D
 

Attachments

  • sakurai problem 1.png
    sakurai problem 1.png
    10.5 KB · Views: 580
  • sakurai problem 2.jpg
    sakurai problem 2.jpg
    52.8 KB · Views: 564
Physics news on Phys.org
If beta were an inverse temperature, P would be the probability to find E_a' in a canonical ensemble.
The precise probability interpretation does not matter too much, as all you want to show is that the limit on beta gives you the ground state energy.
No, the propagator isn't an operator but a matrix element of the the time evolution operator between states <x',t'| and |x,0>.
 
If you will see the text,you will find that space integral of propagator with x''=x' in K(x'',t;x',t0) will give you G(t)=Ʃa'exp(-iEa't/h-).This is just the trace of time evolution operator and is independent of representation.Now you have to identify β=it/h-(with t imaginary),and you will identify it as partition function.
 
Thank you for the replies.

DrDu said:
If beta were an inverse temperature, P would be the probability to find E_a' in a canonical ensemble.

I still do not seem to understand. How do they actually obtain the expression for probability? I don't understand the reasoning behind it.

andrien said:
If you will see the text,you will find that space integral of propagator with x''=x' in K(x'',t;x',t0) will give you G(t)=Ʃa'exp(-iEa't/h-).This is just the trace of time evolution operator and is independent of representation.Now you have to identify β=it/h-(with t imaginary),and you will identify it as partition function.

I didn't even know what a partition function was until I just looked it up. I never took statistical mechanics. :\
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K