Question About Aero Bike Idea - Mike Flanagan UK

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flantoons
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bike
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and design of an "Aero Bike" concept proposed by Mike Flanagan, which aims to store energy in the bike's frame using compressed air generated by arm pumping on the handlebars, alongside potential regenerative braking. The conversation explores the theoretical and practical implications of this idea, including its efficiency and design challenges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Mike Flanagan proposes a bike design that utilizes compressed air generated by arm pumping to store energy in the bike's frame.
  • One participant questions the practicality of riding the bike, noting that leaning forward may hinder the ability to pump the handlebars effectively and could lead to discomfort.
  • Concerns are raised about the structural integrity of the bike frame, suggesting that it would need to be reinforced to handle the pressure without risking failure.
  • Another participant argues that compressed air has a low power-to-weight ratio, making it inefficient for propulsion compared to traditional bike designs.
  • Discussion includes the idea that adding complexity to the bike's energy storage system may lead to inefficiencies, as energy would be temporarily stored only to be used shortly after.
  • There is a consideration of the timing of energy release from the compressed air, with a participant highlighting the need for synchronization with the pedaling motion to avoid opposing forces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express skepticism about the practicality and efficiency of the Aero Bike concept, with multiple competing views on its feasibility and design challenges. No consensus is reached regarding the viability of the proposed energy storage method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the design's complexity, potential structural issues, and the efficiency of energy storage and release mechanisms. These factors remain unresolved in the discussion.

Flantoons
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Please, may I ask for a comment on my idea for the Aero Bike?
I want to store energy in the frame of the bike, by pumping with your arms on the

handlebars to create air pressure, (at the same time as you do your normal

pedaling). Also perhaps regenerative braking can store energy too.

My drawing here explains the idea.
flantoons.co.uk/aero-%20bike.jpg

Many thanks,
Mike Flanagan UK

aero-%20bike.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Can you actually ride that? If you're leaning forward with weight on the handlebars, how do you pull them up? Even then it would be horrible hard work, and bad for your back. Same with the cylinder on the front fork. That's why some mountain bikes can have the shock absorbers locked up, so you aren't wasting energy doing all that pumping.

I like the idea of utilizing that empty space inside the frame. But I doubt you could store any useful amount of energy like that. If you put any significant pressure in it, the frame would have to be made stronger to take the ordinary bike loads added to the pressure load, and with enough safety factor to prevent it exploding or becoming like a rocket when it cracks.

Compressed air is basically useless for propulsion of normal vehicles because it has a very low power to weight ratio. You need a lot of heavy pressure vessel to hold much energy.
 
Goes against all convention of bike design. You don't what bits to move that don't have to as that wastes energy from going forward. Let's take a look at the energy path for a rigid bike, we know the more steps we add the less efficient a system is.

With a rigid bike.
You -> Pedals -> Motion.

With your system
You -> Compressed air -> Pedals -> Motion.

The vast majority of the time you are temporarily storing energy only to be used a split second later. It would be far less tiring to just pedal a rigid bike. As you are the only input, your system will be far more tiring and awkward to ride.

As unrest said, you aren't going to store that much energy even if you can store it at all. Especially the way yuo've drawn it. Either you are comrpessing air with the pedals also (doing work against yourself), or you are just venting the pressurised air into the atmosphere as you have no mechanism to stop the air from rushing out the piston chamber.

Then you need to ask the question, if you sort out a mechanism to store the pressure and realease it on que. Is it really worth the extra weight and complexity?
 
Last edited:
I think it might also be difficult to release the energy at the proper time. In your drawing, if the compressed air is pushing the piston towards your pedals than it would assist in your pedaling motion. However, if the the gear were rotated 180 degrees and the compressed air were pushing the piston towards the pedals then you would actually be opposing your pedal motion. So you would have to make sure that the power stroke is in phase with your pedaling.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
15K