Attempting to create a self rotating magnetic bike

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of creating a self-rotating magnetic bike, with a focus on using magnetic forces for acceleration and maintaining high speeds. Participants explore the feasibility of such designs, the types of magnets that could be used, and the challenges associated with achieving the desired performance without relying on traditional energy sources.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to build a bike that uses magnetic force for acceleration and speed, aiming for a top speed of 100 km/h and good acceleration comparable to cars.
  • Another participant points out that the concept may relate to perpetual motion machines (PMMs), which are not discussed on the forum.
  • Some participants argue that magnets cannot serve as a primary energy source and that motors cannot be created using only permanent magnets, citing that magnets do not perform work after aligning their poles.
  • One participant draws an analogy between climbing and magnet motors, suggesting that any rotating machine returns to its original state, resulting in no net energy gain.
  • Another participant suggests that the only way a magnetic motor could work is if it were possible to separate magnetic poles, which is not feasible, leading to a net result of zero force.
  • There is a mention that even if monopoles existed, they would not resolve the energy conservation issue, as the rotor would still return to a previous position.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the feasibility of using magnets as a primary means of propulsion for the proposed bike. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views on the nature of magnetic forces and energy conservation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the principles of energy conservation and the nature of magnetic forces, particularly in relation to the concept of perpetual motion.

carlosdunick
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all, new on here so thanks in advance for your responce's

I am an avid cyclist and competant engineer, i dislike oil and gas so much i do not own a car. I cycle everywhere.

I am tired of wanting to go long distances without assistance or a high top speed.

I want to build a cycle with the main acceleration and main maintained top speed controlled by magnetic force.

Not a hybrid bike using household electricity thus using my power thus coming from the same consumable fossil fuels.

does anyone out there have any links or point me in the right direction to where i can find information about what magnets to use, are there already cylindrical self maintaining rotating systems out there?
i have many designs floating around from the simplist being magnets on the frame of the bike being fixed to linear bearings being able to move away from magnets fixed on the wheel.

I am affraid that my simple designs will not give me a high top speed. I am thinking 100km. also i need good acceleration also, to enable me to have the same acceleration as any car on the road in a city environment and then obviously be able to travel at the speed limit.

the bike will look as much as it can like your average road bike, two wheels, gears, double disc brakes or better, changing gears i think will still be needed for that initail push and perhaps for overtaking. i am whoever open to all ideas and thoughts.

i hope you get what I am trying to achieve here and once again thank you for your input and replies.


Engineer Carlos NZ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
carlosdunick said:
Hi all, new on here so thanks in advance for your responce's

I am an avid cyclist and competant engineer, i dislike oil and gas so much i do not own a car. I cycle everywhere.

I am tired of wanting to go long distances without assistance or a high top speed.

I want to build a cycle with the main acceleration and main maintained top speed controlled by magnetic force.

Not a hybrid bike using household electricity thus using my power thus coming from the same consumable fossil fuels.

does anyone out there have any links or point me in the right direction to where i can find information about what magnets to use, are there already cylindrical self maintaining rotating systems out there?
i have many designs floating around from the simplist being magnets on the frame of the bike being fixed to linear bearings being able to move away from magnets fixed on the wheel.

I am affraid that my simple designs will not give me a high top speed. I am thinking 100km. also i need good acceleration also, to enable me to have the same acceleration as any car on the road in a city environment and then obviously be able to travel at the speed limit.

the bike will look as much as it can like your average road bike, two wheels, gears, double disc brakes or better, changing gears i think will still be needed for that initail push and perhaps for overtaking. i am whoever open to all ideas and thoughts.

i hope you get what I am trying to achieve here and once again thank you for your input and replies.


Engineer Carlos NZ

Welcome to the PF.

It sounds like you are asking about perpetual motion machines (PMMs). We do not discuss or debunk PMMs here on the PF.
 
I'm afraid Carlos you been misled by your lack of knowledge and ofcourse mainly the internet.
The universe and pretty much everything in it exists the way it is but in order for something to change there needs to be a force , work needs to be done , when you do work you use up energy , something transforms into something different like gasoline to mechanical energy+heat +wear etc.
Magnets themselves don't do work , well they do until they find their matching poles then they stop, so you can get like 0,5 rpm with a magnet motor and then it stops.
I guess the best choice will be to go with batteries and electricity.
 
What others have said. Magnets are not a primary energy source. You can't make a motor using only permanent magnets. That hasn't stopped numerous people trying to do so or even posting claims to have a "working" motor on youtube. All fake or misguided.
 
It took me a while to understand why but there is a similarity to gravity. Consider the potential energy gained by a climber is m*g*Δh. The dimension Δh does not depend on the route taken only the height difference between starting and finishing points. If the climber returns to the starting point then Δh=zero and no potential energy has been gained or lost by the climber.

Much the same applies to magnet motors. If you build a rotating machine then by definition after one or more revolutions it returns to the same point where the magnetic equivalent of Δh above is zero. It also doesn't matter which route is taken (eg which way the "motor" rotates). The net energy gain is zero.

At some point you will find people who claim this can be "solved" using magnetic "shields", but in effect they are just the equivalent of a climber taking a different route. If the climber/magnets ever returns to the starting point the net energy gain is zero.
 
Good analogy CW:)
The only way a magnet motor would work is if we could separate the poles , like have only S's or N's then it would work in the right angles as every magnet on a rotor would try to repel every magnet in the stator , but since this cannot be done , ehh well.We get every one pole trying to push away and every other trying to hold back , the net result is zero
 
Even with monopoles it would still be conservative.
 
What Dale said. Monopoles don't help. The rotor of any magic machine would still have to return to a previous position eventually.
 
Since the OP has not responded, this thread is locked as a PMM debunking discussion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K