Question about buying stuff online

  • Thread starter Thread starter dav1d
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the situation of receiving multiple packages from an online order, specifically addressing the ethical and legal implications of returning one of the items. Participants explore the responsibilities of the buyer and seller in the context of shipping delays and replacements.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about whether to return the second package after receiving the first, questioning the implications of keeping both items.
  • Another suggests contacting the seller to inform them of the first package's arrival and offers to return the second package, emphasizing the importance of good karma.
  • A participant raises the issue of shipping costs for returning the second package, noting that it was not their fault the first package was delayed.
  • Some participants propose that the seller would likely cover return shipping costs if contacted, as it would be more beneficial for them than losing the item.
  • Concerns are raised about the legality of keeping the second package without informing the seller, with one participant asserting that accepting the second package without payment could be considered theft.
  • Legal perspectives are introduced, particularly regarding UK law, where one participant notes that the seller may not need to be informed about the second package since a replacement was sent under the assumption that the first was lost.
  • Another participant references the "distance selling regulations" in the UK, discussing the seller's obligations regarding returns and compliance with the contract.
  • Disagreement arises over the applicability of these regulations to the current situation, with some arguing that the goods delivered late could be considered unsolicited.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions regarding the ethical and legal responsibilities in this situation. While some agree on the importance of informing the seller, others question the necessity of doing so, leading to unresolved perspectives on the matter.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various legal frameworks and shipping policies, but there is no consensus on how these apply to the specific case of receiving multiple packages. The discussion includes assumptions about shipping costs and seller policies that remain unverified.

dav1d
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
So I bought something online only for it not to be delivered for a very long time. I asked the seller to see what was going on and he decided to just ship me an replacement. Problem is, today the first packaged showed up randomly and the second one is in the mail already. So should I return the second one? What should I do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is just me. But I would email the seller and let him know that the first package had arrived and that when the second package arrives i'll send it back.

Just good karma :approve:
 
But then do i pay for shipping back? Technically it wasn't my fault since we both assumed the first package to be lost/really really delayed. I paid for the fast shipping, guaranteed delivery and it missed it by almost a week...
 
I somehow forgot about the shipping cost aspect.

It depends on how much it would cost I guess. I am sure the seller would find a way to pay for it's return if you contacted him (as he will lose out more money if you just kept the item/object). A less likely scenario is that the seller may somehow stop the delivery mid-way and have it returned.
 
I think I overpaid for it in the first place (as in the seller set the price pretty high and i bought it), which was why the seller offered a replacement so quickly...
 
dav1d said:
I think I overpaid for it in the first place (as in the seller set the price pretty high and i bought it), which was why the seller offered a replacement so quickly...
Your options are keep and pay for both, return one, if it comes UPS or Fed Ex and you refuse it, you may not be charged for the return(at least that's my experience, but perhaps that was the sender's policy on refusals).

How was it shipped originally that there was no tracking information?
 
Tracking number but it stopped updating. I really don't know what to do. The seller was pretty ambiguous.
 
dav1d said:
Tracking number but it stopped updating. I really don't know what to do. The seller was pretty ambiguous.
Contact the seller and tell them you received the first package. Since it's now been delivered it is likely confirmation will get to the seller, then if you accept the second and don't pay for it, it's theft. The only question here is if you intend to steal the second item. I can't believe that you are even asking if theft is ok.

Sounds like you are dealing with a decent, honest seller that immediately attempted to make things right.
 
GregJ said:
I somehow forgot about the shipping cost aspect.

It depends on how much it would cost I guess. I am sure the seller would find a way to pay for it's return if you contacted him (as he will lose out more money if you just kept the item/object). A less likely scenario is that the seller may somehow stop the delivery mid-way and have it returned.

Evo said:
Contact the seller and tell them you received the first package. Since it's now been delivered it is likely confirmation will get to the seller, then if you accept the second and don't pay for it, it's theft. The only question here is if you intend to steal the second item. I can't believe that you are even asking if theft is ok.

Sounds like you are dealing with a decent, honest seller that immediately attempted to make things right.

I agree with both, and also am a bit puzzled why you are asking. Anyway, contact the seller and ask for them to pay for the shipping back of the 2nd article. If they missed the "guaranteed delivery" on the first shipment, they should be fine covering the return costs on the 2nd item.
 
  • #10
The law in different countries varies, but in the UK, you probably don't even need to tell the seller about this, since he/she already agreed to send a replacement on the assumption that the original was lost.

If you do tell them, all you are legally required to do (under UK law) is to allow them to take "reasonable steps" to recover the item at their own expense. For example, if they sent you a postage-paid address label, you could not "reasonably" refuse to re-package the item and put it back in the mail, or make arrangements for a courier service to collect it from you.
 
  • #11
AlephZero said:
The law in different countries varies, but in the UK, you probably don't even need to tell the seller about this, since he/she already agreed to send a replacement on the assumption that the original was lost.
I can't find anything on this in UK online purchases where a second item was shipped. All I can find reference to is damaged or canceled orders. Can you post it please? Thanks.
 
  • #12
This is covered in the UK by the "distance selling regulations" (DSR).

See http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/general/oft698.pdf
(sections 3.16 - 3.21, 3.36, etc).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
AlephZero said:
This is covered in the UK by the "distance selling regulations" (DSR).

See http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/general/oft698.pdf
(sections 3.16 - 3.21, 3.36, etc).
None of that applies to this issue.

Do you have something that says that if both packages are received and only charged for one that they can keep the second item without paying or returning, or failure to notify seller?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
I think it does apply.

"If the goods were fault or did not comply with the contract you (the supplier) will have to pay for theiri return whatever the circumstances (3.57).

The goods that were presumed to be lost, did not comply with the contract, because they were not delivered within the timescale of the contract (3.1(vii)).

I would say that when the "lost" goods were unexpectedly delivered, they fall under the category of "unsolicited goods" (3.72) since the original contract had been fulfilled by the replacement items.

Of course the customer may feel a moral obligation to tell the supplier about this, but that's not the same as a legal obligation, and the customer certainly can't be forced to pay for being moral.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K