Question about calculus my dad made me think about

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter HorseRidingTic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of acceleration data to derive velocity and distance, particularly in the context of using an accelerometer to record motion in a hypothetical scenario. Participants explore the mathematical and practical implications of this process, including the use of software for numerical integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether integrating an acceleration graph recorded by an accelerometer can yield accurate velocity and distance measurements, particularly in a hypothetical kidnapping scenario.
  • Another participant suggests that numerical methods would be necessary due to the lack of a well-defined curve, referencing a physics experiment involving an Atwood machine to illustrate the concept of measuring acceleration and deriving velocity and distance.
  • A third participant proposes using Excel as a simple tool for measuring the area under an analog graph, asking if the original poster is familiar with integration techniques in the software.
  • One participant cautions that while integrating acceleration data can work over short periods, errors can accumulate over longer durations, leading to significant inaccuracies in velocity and position, referencing historical practices in aviation for correcting such errors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality and accuracy of integrating acceleration data over time, with some acknowledging the potential for error accumulation while others focus on the methods for numerical integration.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the accuracy of the accelerometer readings, the potential for cumulative errors over time, and the need for periodic corrections in practical applications.

HorseRidingTic
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This is a question I'v got about calculus after doing my bachelors in engineering degree.

So you can integrate an acceleration graph to get velocity, and integrate a velocity graph to get distance.
Integrating a graph can be done by easily finding the area under the graph.
This applies to all polynomial graphs.

So what about analog type recorded information graphs.
Say if you were kidnapped and driven around Rio de Jarinro (a made up city that is just one giant long road going into the Amazon) in the boot of a car with only an accelerometer in your pocket recording an acceleration time graph. If you used a program on your computer to work out the area under the graph, would this plot velocity, and then distance?
If so, what maths programs can measure the area under an analog graph?

Thanks,
neb
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would have to do this numerically as you don’t have a well known curve.

There’s a simple physics experiment that utilizes this approach called the Atwood machine experiment where you drop a weight with an oscillating pen. As the weight falls the pen traces out a stretched sine curve. You measure the distances between the peak and use the time of one complete oscillation and from that can determine the acceleration, velocity and distance traveled.

In your case, you need to record the time and the accelerometer value and then do the math. If you plot it on graph paper you can add up the squares to get the areas or you can make trapezoids from each successive measurement and plot the areas to get th velocity athen repeat to get the distances at each time.
 
HorseRidingTic said:
what maths programs can measure the area under an analog graph?
The simplest is probably just to use Excel. Are you familiar with how to do simple integrations like this with an Excel spreadsheet?
 
That works in practice for a short time and in theory for a long time. But it does not work well in practice over a long length of time. Over a short time, a small error in acceleration can integrate to a small error in velocity and then to a small error in position. But over a long time, the velocity remains wrong and the error in position keeps growing till it is way off. That is why airplanes before GPS which relied on accelerometers had to periodically take "fixes" on known ground positions to correct the growing position errors. (There are other sources of errors from accelerometer-based inertial reference systems, but that gets advanced very quickly.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dr.D, mfb and StoneTemplePython

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K