Question about canonical transformations

  • Thread starter Thread starter javiergra24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformations
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around canonical transformations in classical mechanics, specifically focusing on a given transformation and the requirement to modify it to ensure it is canonical. Participants are exploring the implications of the term "associated canonical transformation" as it appears in the context of an exam question.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the original problem statement and the meaning of "associated canonical transformation." There is speculation about whether it refers to an equivalent transformation in a different form or the inverse transformation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking to understand the requirements of the problem better. Some have proposed interpretations of the term "associated transformation," but there is no consensus on its exact meaning or how to proceed with the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need to check if the given transformation is indeed canonical by imposing conditions related to the Poisson bracket. There is uncertainty regarding the definition and implications of "associated canonical transformation," which is central to the problem.

javiergra24
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody

I've got a problem related to canonical transformations that I can`t solve:

Given the expression of the canonical transformation

[tex] Q=3q\cdot\big[ \exp\big((p+q)^5\big)+1\big] +3p\cdot \big[\exp((p+q)^5)+1\big]+p[/tex]
[tex] P=p+q[/tex]
I have to calculate an associated canonical transformation. Anybody can help me?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you have stated exactly your problem?
 
Exact problems is (from exam):
Given the transformation

[tex] Q=3q\cdot\big[ \exp\big((p+q)^5\big)+1\big] +p\cdot \big[2\exp((p+q)^5)-1\big] [/tex]

[tex] P=q+p[/tex]

Modify it slightly in order to be canonical

Answer. After imposing the condition for the Poisson bracket (equal to one) we get the result:
[tex] \boxed{Q=3q\cdot\big[ \exp\big((p+q)^5\big)+1\big] +3p\cdot \big[\exp((p+q)^5)+1\big]+p}[/tex]

In part two we're asked to obtain an associated canonical transformation. But after reading my books and papers about mechanics I still don't know what's an "associated trasformation mean". Is it the inverse transformation?
 
Last edited:
OK. Now part of the problem is clear - supposing it is indeed a canonical transformation (I didn't check). But what the author of this exercise means by an "associated canonical transformation" - that I don't know.
 
arkajad said:
OK. Now part of the problem is clear - supposing it is indeed a canonical transformation (I didn't check). But what the author of this exercise means by an "associated canonical transformation" - that I don't know.

Same here. I suppose the questioner might just be looking for an equivalent transformation, but written in a different functional form... something like

[tex]Q=Q(q,P)=3P\left(e^{P^5}+1\right) +P-q[/tex] and [tex]P=q+p[/tex]
instead of
[tex]Q=Q(q,p)=3q\left(e^{(p+q)^5}+1\right)+3p\left(e^{(p+q)^5}+1\right)+p[/tex] and [tex]P=q+p[/tex]

...but that's just a guess
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K