Question about conditions for Force Free Fields in plasma

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the conditions for Force Free Fields in plasma stability within the Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) regime. The key equation derived from the Navier-Stokes equation is $$\vec{\nabla} P = \frac{1}{c} \vec{J} \times \vec{B}$$, leading to the condition $$(\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{B}) = \alpha(r) \vec{B}$$ for Force Free Fields. The participant raises a critical question regarding the nature of the curl of a vector, noting that while the cross-product is orthogonal to both vectors, the curl can have components along the direction of the vector, particularly when a constant is added to the magnetic field vector, B.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically curl and cross-product operations
  • Knowledge of plasma physics and stability concepts
  • Basic grasp of the Navier-Stokes equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Force Free Fields in plasma stability
  • Explore the mathematical properties of curl and cross-products in vector calculus
  • Investigate the role of magnetic fields in MHD systems
  • Examine the Navier-Stokes equations in the context of plasma dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in plasma physics, students studying Magnetohydrodynamics, and physicists interested in the stability of plasma systems.

Clear Mind
Messages
38
Reaction score
3
My question is about Force Free fields in the study of plasma stability (in MHD regime): Consider an isolated ideal plasma in an equilibrium state (where the effect of selfgravity is negligible), from the Navier-Stokes equation we get that:

$$\vec{\nabla} P = \frac{1}{c} \vec{J} \times \vec{B}$$

Now, if ##P=const## and ##\vec{J}## (in MHD ##\vec{J}\propto\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{B}##) is parallel to ##\vec{B}##, we get that ##(\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{B}) \times \vec{B}=0##. Thus implies that:

$$(\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{B}) = \alpha(r) \vec{B}$$

That is the condition for a Free-Froce fields. So ... the question is, shouldn't be the curl of a vector always be orthogonal to the vector?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The cross-product is orthogonal to the two vectors, but the curl is not a proper cross-product. It can have a component along the direction of the vector. This is easy to see if you add a constant to B: its curl won't change, but you can change the direction of B arbitrarily.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clear Mind
mfb said:
The cross-product is orthogonal to the two vectors, but the curl is not a proper cross-product. It can have a component along the direction of the vector. This is easy to see if you add a constant to B: its curl won't change, but you can change the direction of B arbitrarily.

Ok, i see! Many thanks for the help :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
739
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K