Question about defn. of derivative

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Let [itex]\{h_n\}[/itex] be ANY sequence of real numbers such that [itex]h_n \neq 0[/tex] and [itex]h_n \to 0[/itex]. If [itex]f'(x)[/itex] exists, do we have<br /> <br /> [tex] f'(x) = \lim_{n\to \infty} f_n(x),[/tex]<br /> <br /> where <br /> [tex] f_n(x) = \frac{1}{h_n} (f(x+h_n) - f(x))[/tex]<br /> <br /> ?<br /> <br /> This seems to express the derivative as the pointwise limit of a sequence of functions...right? Do we know, in addition, that the convergence is uniform?[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uniform in what sense? The definition does not require uniformity in x.
 
mathman said:
Uniform in what sense? The definition does not require uniformity in x.

Ok, I'm not sure :) I didn't really think before writing out that question. But am I right on all other counts?
 
You are right, but it is more cumbersome than the usual approach where:

f'(x)=lim(h->0) (f(x+h) - f(x))/h
 
[itex]lim_{x\to a} f(x)= L[/itex] if and only if [itex]\lim_{n\to \infty} f(a_n)= L[/itex] for every sequence [itex]\{a_n\}[/itex] that converges to a. The two formulations are equivalent.