Question about excited atoms etc.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Denver Dang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Excited
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of exciting electrons in atoms and molecules, particularly in the context of phase changes and structural alterations. Participants explore whether exciting an electron leads to changes in the state of matter (e.g., liquid to gas) or affects molecular properties without causing a phase transition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether exciting an electron in a molecule leads to a change in the molecule's state or structure, particularly in relation to phase changes.
  • One participant argues that exciting a single electron alters properties such as charge density, bond strength, dipole moment, and geometry, but does not cause a phase change.
  • Another participant explains that while a single electron excitation changes molecular properties, it typically does not lead to bond breaking unless ionization occurs.
  • It is noted that phase is a macroscopic property and does not apply to individual molecules, as phase transitions depend on average thermal energy relative to intermolecular bonding energy.
  • Participants mention that excited electrons usually return to their ground state quickly, with exceptions for long-lived excited states that can behave as different molecules, such as singlet oxygen being more reactive than triplet oxygen.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that exciting electrons changes molecular properties but disagree on the implications for phase changes and whether these changes are significant at the molecular level. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the relationship between electronic excitation and macroscopic phase transitions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the energy required for phase transitions depends on the volume of material and that the relationship between electronic energy and thermal energy is complex and not straightforward.

Denver Dang
Messages
143
Reaction score
1
A quick question...

When you excite electrons or so in molecules, atoms etc., do the molecule/atom change, or what does happen ?

I mean, if you have water, and excite an electron, do it turn from "liquid" to "gas", or the other way around, or doesn't it change its structure or what you can call it ?

I know that you can ionize an atom if you excite an electron to "infinity". But if you just go from the ground state to the 1st excited state, does anything happen there, if you take into account that it doesn't decay to the ground state almost instant.

Hope you know what I mean.

Regards :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Denver Dang said:
A quick question...

When you excite electrons or so in molecules, atoms etc., do the molecule/atom change, or what does happen ?

I mean, if you have water, and excite an electron, do it turn from "liquid" to "gas", or the other way around, or doesn't it change its structure or what you can call it ?

I know that you can ionize an atom if you excite an electron to "infinity". But if you just go from the ground state to the 1st excited state, does anything happen there, if you take into account that it doesn't decay to the ground state almost instant.

Hope you know what I mean.

Regards :)

I'm not sure what you mean... are you asking if ELECTRONS undergo some kind of phase change (they don't)? If you're asking what amount of energy causes a phase transition in given material... that's the question, and it's simple and a question of chemistry. Excitation is achieved by adding energy... so take a simple example: you have an ice-cube, and you put it over a burner... you're adding energy, causing molecular motion to increase, and the ice phase-changes to water (it melts). Keep going and you get steam... and so forth.

The amount of energy needed depends on the volume of material, i.e. how many molecules of the substance. You can't just take some water and pick a single electron and excite it, you just dump energy into it. If I've missed your question, I apologize, but you're mixing the macroscopic with the microscopic.
 
Denver Dang said:
When you excite electrons or so in molecules, atoms etc., do the molecule/atom change, or what does happen ?

They will change, yes. Exciting a single electron will change the charge density around the atom/molecule, its bond strength, its dipole moment, its geometry, and quite a few things.

If you look at the simplest possible molecule, H2+, then any electronic excitation will lead to it dissociating (because there's only the one electron holding it together, and only one 'bonding' electronic state). But with most molecules a single electron excitation isn't usually enough to cause a (covalent) bond to break. Ionization might, though.

It doesn't cause a phase change though. Phase (gas/liquid etc) is a macroscopic property. It just doesn't make sense to say whether a single molecule is gas or liquid. E.g. a water molecule might hydrogen bond to 3-4 other water molecules in the liquid. But a cluster of 5 water molecules in vacuum doesn't constitute a water droplet. In simple terms, phase is whether or not the average thermal energy exceeds the average intermolecular bonding energy. But the electronic energy is largely decoupled from the thermal energy.

In most cases, an excited electron simply returns to its ground state before much can happen chemically (with some exceptions like photochemical reactions, which often involve ionization rather than a bound excitation). In the cases where an excited electronic state is long-lived enough to persist for chemically-relevant timescales, it's effectively a different molecule. When chemists talk about O2, they mean oxygen in its triplet spin state, the ground state. If they mean the excited singlet spin state, which is relatively stable, then they say "singlet oxygen".

Singlet oxygen is much more reactive than triplet oxygen for the same reason that it's relatively stable as an excited state. Electrons can't spontaneously flip their spin and change from singlet to triplet, due to selection rules/conservation laws. If it hadn't been for that, we'd all spontaneously combust immediately, because the same rules stop triplet oxygen from immediately reacting. (because both the molecules it'd react with, and the product molecules would be singlets.)
 
alxm said:
They will change, yes. Exciting a single electron will change the charge density around the atom/molecule, its bond strength, its dipole moment, its geometry, and quite a few things.

If you look at the simplest possible molecule, H2+, then any electronic excitation will lead to it dissociating (because there's only the one electron holding it together, and only one 'bonding' electronic state). But with most molecules a single electron excitation isn't usually enough to cause a (covalent) bond to break. Ionization might, though.

It doesn't cause a phase change though. Phase (gas/liquid etc) is a macroscopic property. It just doesn't make sense to say whether a single molecule is gas or liquid. E.g. a water molecule might hydrogen bond to 3-4 other water molecules in the liquid. But a cluster of 5 water molecules in vacuum doesn't constitute a water droplet. In simple terms, phase is whether or not the average thermal energy exceeds the average intermolecular bonding energy. But the electronic energy is largely decoupled from the thermal energy.

In most cases, an excited electron simply returns to its ground state before much can happen chemically (with some exceptions like photochemical reactions, which often involve ionization rather than a bound excitation). In the cases where an excited electronic state is long-lived enough to persist for chemically-relevant timescales, it's effectively a different molecule. When chemists talk about O2, they mean oxygen in its triplet spin state, the ground state. If they mean the excited singlet spin state, which is relatively stable, then they say "singlet oxygen".

Singlet oxygen is much more reactive than triplet oxygen for the same reason that it's relatively stable as an excited state. Electrons can't spontaneously flip their spin and change from singlet to triplet, due to selection rules/conservation laws. If it hadn't been for that, we'd all spontaneously combust immediately, because the same rules stop triplet oxygen from immediately reacting. (because both the molecules it'd react with, and the product molecules would be singlets.)

@ Bolded portion: :smile: That's the kind of line you just don't hear outside of PF too often.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K