Question about Expansion Speed exceeding Ligth Speed

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the universe's expansion speed in relation to the speed of light, particularly in the context of the early universe following the Big Bang. Participants explore the implications of general and special relativity on this topic, examining whether the statement about the universe expanding thousands of light years in a short time is accurate or if it contradicts established physical laws.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of the claim that the universe expanded thousands of light years within minutes after the Big Bang, citing the speed limit of light as a potential contradiction.
  • Another participant argues that the expansion of the universe should not be viewed as ordinary motion, suggesting that distances increase uniformly without objects moving through space, thus not violating the speed of light limit.
  • A further contribution states that general relativity modifies the understanding of the speed limit, indicating that while nothing can outrun a light ray, distances between far-apart objects can increase faster than light due to the expansion of space itself.
  • Another participant reiterates that while objects cannot travel faster than light, the fabric of space can expand at speeds exceeding that of light, which does not violate physical laws.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the universe's expansion relative to the speed of light. There is no consensus on whether the initial statement about the universe's expansion is correct or how it aligns with the principles of relativity.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of interpreting the expansion of the universe and its relationship with the speed of light, emphasizing the need for clarity on definitions and the nature of motion versus expansion in cosmological contexts.

Noaly
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was recently watching "Into the Universe with Stephen Hawkings" (a general video about the universe on Science Channel) when I heard the statement "Just 10 minutes after the Big Bang, the Universe was 1,000s of light years across." How is this possible if nothing can travel faster than light. Even if two things traveled in the exact opposite directions from the initial start of the Big Bang at the speed of light, they would only be 20 lightminutes apart. Is this statement simply incorrect, or was it possibly to expand much faster than light in the Universe's infancy?
 
Space news on Phys.org


A pattern of uniform expansion is not like ordinary motion.
Nobody gets anywhere, nobody approaches a destination, everything just gets farther apart.

So it is not governed by the speed limit of Einstein's 1905 (special) relativity.

Think of expansion as a change in geometry, not as ordinary motion thru space.
the relative positions of things don't change, distances just uniformly scale up.

It may help you to watch the balloon model animation. That shows photons of light traveling at a constant speed across the expanding face of the balloon. The link is in my signature, or google "wright balloon model".
by contrast, the galaxies do not move. they stay at the same longitude-latitude position on the balloon.

The point of Einstein's 1915 (general) relativity is that we have no right to expect that distances between stationary observers remain constant. Geometry is dynamic. The theory explains WHY the angles of triangle add up to 180 in some places and add up to more or less in other situations. Why distances sometimes increase (or decrease) between stationary observers. You should be wondering what criterion for being stationary is used in cosmology. Ask about it if curious.

Don't think of the universe expanding from a point outwards into empty space. Think of of all space uniformly filled with matter, no space "outside" of space, because there is no outside. And expansion is an internal process, internal to the universe. It does not expand "into" anything. Distances simply increase by a certain percentage each year.
 
Last edited:
Another way to state it is that General Relativity modifies the way the speed limit is stated: in General Relativity, nothing can outrun a light ray. That is to say, if a light ray follows some path through the universe, there is no way for any object to follow that same path any faster.

Things in the universe that are already far apart can get further apart much faster than c because the light rays are carried along with the expansion just like everything else: nothing is moving faster than a local light ray, so there isn't any violation of the speed of light limit.
 
Put simply, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, as predicted by theory.

But space (the medium through which everything is travelling) itself can expand faster than the speed of light.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
253
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K