Question about modular functions

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Taturana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties and definitions of modular functions, specifically focusing on the function f(x) = |2x + 4| + 3. Participants explore how to determine the conditions for piecewise definitions of such functions and the implications of continuity at specific points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Rafael Andreatta questions how to determine the correct inequalities for the piecewise definition of the modular function, specifically why the first condition is x ≥ -2 and the second is x < -2.
  • Some participants assert that the continuity of the absolute value function implies that the function f(x) must also be continuous, suggesting that the two halves of the piecewise definition must agree at the point where they meet.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of continuity, with one participant asking whether the continuity of |x| or f(x) is relevant to the question posed.
  • Another participant introduces the idea that if the function were not continuous, one could evaluate the function at the point of interest to determine which piece applies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the continuity of the function f(x) and its implications for the piecewise definition, but there is no consensus on the specific inequalities or how to approach the determination of those conditions.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about continuity and the behavior of piecewise functions are present, but these are not fully resolved. The discussion does not clarify the implications of discontinuous functions in this context.

Taturana
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have any modular function, for example:

[tex]f(x) = |2x + 4| + 3[/tex]

I can rewrite the function in the following way:

[tex]f(x) = \left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> 2x + 7, \;\; x \geq -2\\<br /> -2x -1, \;\; x < -2 <br /> <br /> \end{matrix}\right.[/tex]

right?

Okay, the question is: how do I know that the first condition is [tex]\geq[/tex] and second condition is < and not vice-versa?

Thank you,
Rafael Andreatta
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It doesn't matter, because |x| is a continuous function. What's the value of f(x) for x=-2?
 
Petr Mugver said:
It doesn't matter, because |x| is a continuous function. What's the value of f(x) for x=-2?

1. You mean, because |x| is a continuous function or because f is a continuous function?

2. What if it was not continuous?
 
f(x) is a continuous function, so the two halves of the definition must agree where they meet up.

Since adding and multiplying and composing continuous functions is a continuous function, and sum of absolute value functions like f(x) here will be continuous. In the event you're doing something like dividing by the absolute value of x, then you can just:
plug in the value of x for which you're unsure and compare it to your formulae. See which one it agrees with. If the function isn't defined for that value of x, then you don't need to decide which inequality gets the equal sign because you aren't defining the function anyway
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K