Question about Natural Units in High Energy Physics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the use of natural units in high energy physics, specifically addressing the relationship between time and mass. In natural units, where c = h = 1, time is correctly expressed as t = 1/m, not t = 1/m², which was identified as a typo. The conversation highlights the equivalence of space and time measurements, as well as energy and mass, emphasizing the importance of understanding these relationships for accurate calculations in high energy physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of natural units in physics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of mass-energy equivalence
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics and particle physics
  • Ability to interpret equations involving Planck's constant and the speed of light
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of natural units in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the Yukawa potential and its applications in particle interactions
  • Explore the relationship between mass, energy, and momentum in relativistic physics
  • Investigate the role of Planck's constant in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of high energy physics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics and particle interactions.

Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,109
Reaction score
20
I have a quick question about the units used in high energy physics. In natural units, c = h = 1, but I keep seeing time referenced as t=\frac{1}{m^2}. I figure there's 2 h-bars on top but that still leaves s^2. Can someone straighten me out here? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming you remember the speed of light, the only other combination you need to remember is \hbar c\approx 200 MeV fm
(It's really 197.326 9631(49) according to PDG[/URL])

With unit c=1 you get that space and time are really measured in the same unit, as well as energy and mass
(and momentum, when restoring c just remember [itex]E^2=p^2c^2+m^2c^4[/itex])
So finally [itex]\hbar[/itex]=1 gives you time and mass (or space and energy) with opposite dimensions :

t ~ [itex]\hbar c[/itex]/m[itex]c^2[/itex]
x~ct
E~pc
xp~[itex]\hbar[/itex]
Et~[itex]\hbar[/itex]For instance an interaction which would be mediated by a pion (with mass 135-139 MeV/c[sup]2[/sup]) will act (with a Yukawa potential) over distances of the order of :
200/140 ~ 1.5 fm (just about twice the usual definition of the size of the proton, quite good considering the handwaviness)

The typical interaction time is also 1.5x10[sup]-9[/sup]/3x10[sup]8[/sup] ~ 5x10[sup]-18[/sup] s
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pengwuino said:
I have a quick question about the units used in high energy physics. In natural units, c = h = 1, but I keep seeing time referenced as t=\frac{1}{m^2}. I figure there's 2 h-bars on top but that still leaves s^2. Can someone straighten me out here? Thanks!

To add to what Humanino wrote: in natural units t=1/m. If you have seen t =1/m^2 it was a typo.
 
nrqed said:
To add to what Humanino wrote: in natural units t=1/m. If you have seen t =1/m^2 it was a typo.

Sorry, I meant to change it but never got around to it. In the discussions I've been seeing it, the time was proportional to \frac{1}{m^2}. So there's some constants that I'm missing because the speaker was just showing us various proportionalitys
 
Pengwuino said:
Sorry, I meant to change it but never got around to it. In the discussions I've been seeing it, the time was proportional to \frac{1}{m^2}. So there's some constants that I'm missing because the speaker was just showing us various proportionalitys

Well, time is not proportional to \frac{1}{m^2} but to \frac{1}{m}.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
13K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
985
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K