Question about orbits and Kepler's problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on Kepler's problem, specifically the conditions under which a projectile can be captured by a central attractive potential, such as the Sun. It establishes that a projectile starting from infinity with a given velocity and impact parameter cannot achieve a bound orbit due to conservation of energy principles. The conversation highlights that while bound orbits are defined by finite major and semi-major axes, a particle at infinity cannot belong to these orbits. Additionally, it notes that capture can occur only through interactions with other bodies, which is relevant for research on dark matter particles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kepler's laws of planetary motion
  • Familiarity with concepts of energy and angular momentum in classical mechanics
  • Knowledge of central force problems in physics
  • Basic principles of conservation of energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Kepler's laws from Newton's laws of motion
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of energy and angular momentum in orbital mechanics
  • Research the conditions for gravitational capture in multi-body systems
  • Investigate the role of dark matter in astrophysical interactions
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, physicists, and researchers interested in orbital mechanics, gravitational interactions, and dark matter studies will benefit from this discussion.

L0r3n20
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
I've been looking at the Kepler's problem, and it looks like your orbit (elliptic, parabolic or hyperbolic) are given in terms of energy and angular momentum. I was wondering: if I have a central attractive potential (such as the Sun) and a projectile starting from an infinite distance at a given velocity and impact parameter, would it be possible to obtain the orbit equation for such an object? I mean: I would like to solve Kepler's problem for a projectile after a given velocity and impact parameter.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The quantities you quoted are directly relatable to the energy and angular momentum, so yes.
 
Orodruin said:
The quantities you quoted are directly relatable to the energy and angular momentum, so yes.
The module of the angular momentum can be expressed as L = m v b (being b the impact parameter) but what about the energy? I mean if the projectile is at an infinite distance it has only kinetic (therefore positive) energy, so I cannot find any bounded state. What am I missing?
 
If the particle can reach infinity, it obviously is not in a bound state by definition.
 
Orodruin said:
If the particle can reach infinity, it obviously is not in a bound state by definition.
But what if it starts from infinity moving towards the Sun?
 
If it is at infinity it is not in a bound orbit, precisely because of what you mentioned.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kasoll
Look at it this way: The bound orbits are ellipses of finite major and semi-major axis. Therefore a particle at infinity cannot be on one of those ellipses.
 
Orodruin said:
Look at it this way: The bound orbits are ellipses of finite major and semi-major axis. Therefore a particle at infinity cannot be on one of those ellipses.
Ok, i get it but I was wondering if a particle coming from infinite be captured by an attractive potential and bound into a closed orbit.
 
If it is moving solely under the influence of a central potential: No, that would violate conservation of energy.

Of course it can be captured if it interacts with another body and transfers enough energy to it (part of my research deals with the possible capture of dark matter particles by the Sun.), but this requires additional interactions beyond the motion in the central potential.
 
  • #10
Orodruin said:
If it is moving solely under the influence of a central potential: No, that would violate conservation of energy.

Of course it can be captured if it interacts with another body and transfers enough energy to it (part of my research deals with the possible capture of dark matter particles by the Sun.), but this requires additional interactions beyond the motion in the central potential.
Thanks, I really understood! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K