Question about rewriting an expression with radicals

In summary, the given expression (-3/x^(1/2)) / ((2/y^(1/2))-8) can be rewritten with radicals as (-3/sqrt(x)) / ((2-8sqrt(y))/(sqrt(y))). This is achieved by rationalizing the denominator, which involves multiplying by its conjugate. The original expression was also simplified by finding a common denominator and subtracting. Overall, the rewritten form is -(3sqrt(y))/(2sqrt(x)(1-4sqrt(y))).
  • #1
Joe_K
33
0

Homework Statement

(-3/x^(1/2)) / ((2/y^(1/2))-8)

which, from my book, I see can be rewritten with radicals as:

(-3/sqrt(x)) / ((2-8sqrt(y))/(sqrt(y)))

The Attempt at a Solution



Now, what I don't understand is how the denominator was rewritten. I understand that in the numerator, the 1/( x^(1/2)) becomes sqrt(x), but why does the denominator turn out like it does? Why do I end up with two separate "sqrt(y)" terms? Could someone perhaps walk me through what was done to rewrite the denominator with radicals as shown above^? I would greatly appreciate it. I know that the rewritten expression that I have is correct because it is from my book, but I just don't understand how they rewrote it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
They rationalized the denominator, probably by multiplying it by it's conjugate (both numerator and denominator)

[tex]\frac{2}{\sqrt{y}-8}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{2(\sqrt{y}+8)}{(\sqrt{y}-8)(\sqrt{y}+8)}[/tex]

at least I believe, it's hard to see through all those brackets.
 
  • #3
Actually, it looks like that the original is this:
[itex]\frac{\frac{-3}{x^{1/2}}}{\frac{2}{y^{1/2}} - 8}[/itex]
and the rewritten form is
[itex]\frac{\frac{-3}{\sqrt{x}}}{\frac{2 - 8\sqrt{y}}{\sqrt{y}}}[/itex]

If so, then all that was done was to subtract, after finding a common denominator:
[itex]\frac{2}{y^{1/2}} - 8 = \frac{2}{\sqrt{y}} - \frac{8\sqrt{y}}{\sqrt{y}} = ...[/itex]
 
  • #4
I simplified it as follows:

[itex]
\frac{\frac{-3}{\sqrt{x}}}{\frac{2}{\sqrt{y}}-8}
=
\frac{\frac{-3}{\sqrt{x}}}{\frac{2-8\sqrt{y}}{\sqrt{y}}}
=
(\frac{-3}{\sqrt{x}})(\frac{\sqrt{y}}{2-8\sqrt{y}})
=
-(\frac{3\sqrt{y}}{2\sqrt{x}-8\sqrt{xy}})
=
-(\frac{3\sqrt{y}}{2\sqrt{x}(1-4\sqrt{y})})
[/itex]

I'm currently learning algebra, so please correct me if I'm wrong.
 

FAQ: Question about rewriting an expression with radicals

What is an expression with radicals?

An expression with radicals is a mathematical expression that contains radicals, which are square roots, cube roots, or higher roots of numbers. These radicals can be simplified or rewritten in different forms to make the expression easier to work with.

Why would I need to rewrite an expression with radicals?

Rewriting an expression with radicals can make it simpler and easier to solve. It can also help in evaluating and simplifying complex expressions, as well as identifying patterns and relationships between different mathematical expressions.

What are some common techniques for rewriting an expression with radicals?

One common technique is to rationalize the denominator by multiplying the expression by the conjugate of the denominator. Another technique is to use exponent rules to simplify the expression. Additionally, you can also use substitution or factoring to rewrite an expression with radicals.

How do I know if I have rewritten an expression with radicals correctly?

You can check if you have rewritten an expression with radicals correctly by simplifying the expression and making sure it is equivalent to the original expression. You can also plug in values for the variables in the expression to see if the results match.

Are there any shortcuts or tricks for rewriting expressions with radicals?

There are some common patterns and relationships between different mathematical expressions that can help in rewriting expressions with radicals. For example, the square root of a product can be rewritten as the product of square roots. Another trick is to use the properties of exponents to simplify the expression.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
981
Replies
17
Views
995
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top