Question about rms value of a sine wave

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effective value (RMS value) of a sine wave, specifically comparing the commonly accepted RMS value of 0.707 to an alternative calculation yielding 0.637. Participants explore the implications of these values in different contexts, such as heating effects and average values in electromagnet applications.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why the effective value of a sine wave is 0.707 instead of 0.637, which is derived from integrating over the domain [0, ∏] and dividing by the length of the domain.
  • One participant explains that RMS stands for "root mean squared," emphasizing the necessity of squaring the sine wave before integration to arrive at the RMS value.
  • Another participant notes that the 0.707 figure is significant in contexts involving heating effects, as it represents the equivalent DC amplitude that produces the same heating in a resistor.
  • Conversely, the 0.637 value is mentioned as relevant in situations where average values are of interest, such as in the case of electromagnets, where it corresponds to the average field strength produced by a rectified sine wave.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of the two values (0.707 and 0.637) and their applicability in various contexts. No consensus is reached regarding which value is more appropriate in general terms, as both have their specific uses.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the distinction between RMS and average values, as well as the conditions under which each is applicable. There is an implicit assumption that the definitions of RMS and average values are understood, but the specific contexts for their use remain a point of contention.

qwas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Sorry if this sounds like a dumb question, but why is the effective value of a sine wave 0.707, as opposed to 0.637 which is the value generated by finding the definite integral over the domain [0,∏] divided length of the domain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RMS means "root mean SQUARED", so we have to square the sine wave before integrating. Regarding why we use this measurement, it is essentially a generalization of Euclidean distance: ##\sqrt{\int |x(t)|^2 dt}## is a limiting form of ##\sqrt{|x(t_1)|^2 + |x(t_2)|^2 + \ldots + |x(t_n)|^2}##, which is the distance between the point ##(x(t_1), x(t_2), \ldots, x(t_n))## and the origin. There are many other reasons to prefer the RMS as well: it plays nicely with how we measure the energy in a random quantity (variable or process), namely the standard deviation. Also, the RMS of a function/signal is preserved when we transform to the frequency domain via the Fourier transform.

Mathematically, "RMS" is also a common way to measure the norm ("size") of a function: we call it the ##L^2## norm. Working in the ##L^2## space is very nice because it is a Hilbert space, unlike the other ##L^p## spaces, and because the Fourier transform is an isometry on the ##L^2## space. Don't worry if these terms are unfamiliar - you may see them eventually if you study advanced mathematics or physics, but otherwise you can probably live a perfectly happy life if you never hear about them again. :smile:
 
Last edited:
By the way, the calculation you performed is also a common way of measuring the size of a function/signal. In mathematics we call it the ##L^1## norm: ##\int |x(t)| dt##. It is a limiting form of ##|x(t_1)| + |x(t_2)| + \ldots + |x(t_n)|##, which is another way of measuring the distance between a point and the origin, assuming you are constrained to travel along an orthogonal "grid" to get to the point.
 
Alright, thanks for the help!
 
qwas said:
Sorry if this sounds like a dumb question, but why is the effective value of a sine wave 0.707, as opposed to 0.637 which is the value generated by finding the definite integral over the domain [0,∏] divided length of the domain?
The 0.707 figure is relevant where we are concerned with heating, or the heat produced by that waveform. So a sinewave of amplitude Av produces heat in a resistance equivalent to that produced by DC of amplitude 0.707Av, since instantaneous power = i2(t).R

The 0.637 figure also has its uses, but to situations where we are concerned with average. For example, an electromagnet is roughly linear, so if you applied a rectified sinewave of amplitude Av to the windings of an electromagnet, the field strength produced will have an average value equal to that produced by applying DC of magnitude 0.637Av to the windings.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
15K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K