Question About SETI & Time Chauvinism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kevin the Crackpot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Seti
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of detecting extraterrestrial signals, particularly regarding the timing of potential communications, such as sequences of prime numbers. Concerns about "time chauvinism" suggest that humans may misinterpret the pacing of signals due to their own short lifespan compared to potentially long-lived civilizations. While radio astronomers process signals for patterns, the vast time scales involved could hinder effective communication. The conversation also highlights that advanced civilizations would likely prioritize rapid data transmission, making the likelihood of receiving slow signals minimal. Ultimately, the complexities of interstellar communication raise questions about the feasibility of current SETI methods in detecting intelligent life.
  • #31
mfb said:
For long distances everything is a point source, and even with non-isotropic emission the intensity drops with the inverse distance squared. You can't focus signals over a distance of more than (emitter diameter)2/wavelength (order of magnitude estimate).
You can regard what happens as the directive antenna (or light projector) illuminating a portion of a sphere. This would be the equivalent (as far as an on-beam receiver as what you would get from an isotropic radiator with a power of 1/(illuminated area). In antenna spec they use a term Max EIRP or Maximum Effective Isotropic Radiated Power. A receiver wouldn't know the difference between a 1kW isotropic source and a 1W source with a directive antenna with Gain of 30dB.
 
  • Like
Likes Kevin the Crackpot
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
513
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K